SDIV vs. ICF
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF).
SDIV and ICF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SDIV is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global SuperDividend Index. It was launched on Jun 8, 2011. ICF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index. It was launched on Jan 29, 2001. Both SDIV and ICF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SDIV or ICF.
Correlation
The correlation between SDIV and ICF is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SDIV vs. ICF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SDIV:
0.22
ICF:
0.41
SDIV:
0.38
ICF:
0.66
SDIV:
1.05
ICF:
1.08
SDIV:
0.07
ICF:
0.25
SDIV:
0.73
ICF:
1.49
SDIV:
4.31%
ICF:
4.46%
SDIV:
14.37%
ICF:
16.09%
SDIV:
-56.90%
ICF:
-76.73%
SDIV:
-40.63%
ICF:
-14.74%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDIV achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than ICF's 4.57% return. Over the past 10 years, SDIV has underperformed ICF with an annualized return of -3.42%, while ICF has yielded a comparatively higher 5.02% annualized return.
SDIV
0.52%
-3.90%
-1.48%
1.18%
-8.38%
-3.42%
ICF
4.57%
-5.86%
7.24%
5.69%
3.36%
5.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SDIV vs. ICF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDIV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than ICF's 0.34% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SDIV vs. ICF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SDIV vs. ICF - Dividend Comparison
SDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.43%, more than ICF's 2.68% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF | 11.43% | 11.73% | 14.17% | 8.95% | 7.96% | 8.74% | 9.22% | 6.66% | 6.95% | 7.33% | 6.45% | 6.89% |
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 2.68% | 2.76% | 2.64% | 1.82% | 2.38% | 2.55% | 3.20% | 3.10% | 4.32% | 3.30% | 3.00% | 3.41% |
Drawdowns
SDIV vs. ICF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDIV drawdown since its inception was -56.90%, smaller than the maximum ICF drawdown of -76.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDIV and ICF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SDIV vs. ICF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) is 3.73%, while iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that SDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.