PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDIV vs. FEZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDIV vs. FEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDIV achieves a 8.49% return, which is significantly lower than FEZ's 11.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SDIV has underperformed FEZ with an annualized return of -0.29%, while FEZ has yielded a comparatively higher 11.24% annualized return.


SDIV

1D
0.28%
1M
2.38%
6M
1.25%
YTD
8.49%
1Y
19.40%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
1.38%
10Y*
-0.29%
ALL TIME*
1.26%

FEZ

1D
1.00%
1M
2.15%
6M
6.43%
YTD
11.38%
1Y
26.62%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
11.56%
10Y*
11.24%
ALL TIME*
7.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$54.62M$50.91M$93.92M
$7.65M$8.97M$10.68M

SDIV vs. FEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDIV
Global X SuperDividend ETF
8.49%29.12%1.77%5.46%-26.43%3.76%-20.89%13.04%-15.07%11.95%
FEZ
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
11.38%37.81%3.57%27.16%-14.27%14.84%4.84%26.04%-15.85%24.80%

Correlation

The correlation between SDIV and FEZ is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2011

0.74

The correlation between SDIV and FEZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

SDIV vs. FEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDIV
FEZ

Real Estate

33.0%

-

Financial Services

15.5%
26.2%

Energy

13.3%
4.5%

Industrials

10.4%
22.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
9.5%

Basic Materials

3.7%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
5.6%

Communication Services

3.3%
1.9%

Technology

2.8%
16.6%

Utilities

1.0%
4.9%

Healthcare

0.9%
5.3%

Real Estate

SDIV
33.0%
FEZ

-

Financial Services

SDIV
15.5%
FEZ
26.2%

Energy

SDIV
13.3%
FEZ
4.5%

Industrials

SDIV
10.4%
FEZ
22.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SDIV
5.3%
FEZ
9.5%

Basic Materials

SDIV
3.7%
FEZ
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

SDIV
3.6%
FEZ
5.6%

Communication Services

SDIV
3.3%
FEZ
1.9%

Technology

SDIV
2.8%
FEZ
16.6%

Utilities

SDIV
1.0%
FEZ
4.9%

Healthcare

SDIV
0.9%
FEZ
5.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDIV vs. FEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SDIV
SDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FEZ
FEZ Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SDIV vs. FEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDIVFEZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.25

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

1.96

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.30

6.84

+0.46

SDIV vs. FEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the FEZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDIV and FEZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDIV vs. FEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDIV drawdown since its inception was -56.90%, smaller than the maximum FEZ drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDIV and FEZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDIVFEZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.90%

-64.21%

+7.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

-13.63%

+6.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.64%

-15.85%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.69%

-35.05%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.90%

-39.69%

-17.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.82%

0.00%

-15.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.57%

-16.96%

-1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

3.90%

-1.23%

Volatility

SDIV vs. FEZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) is 2.62%, while State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that SDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDIVFEZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

4.89%

-2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.62%

15.97%

-6.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.26%

18.42%

-6.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.80%

20.70%

-3.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.88%

20.70%

-1.82%

SDIV vs. FEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDIV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than FEZ's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDIV vs. FEZ - Dividend Comparison

SDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.05%, more than FEZ's 2.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEZ
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
2.53%2.78%2.94%2.75%3.06%2.61%2.13%2.61%3.45%2.44%3.35%3.03%
SDIV
Global X SuperDividend ETF
9.05%9.59%11.33%11.73%14.17%8.95%7.96%8.73%9.22%6.66%6.95%7.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDIV and FEZ have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEZ has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to SDIV (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDIV dropped -56.90% vs FEZ's -64.21%.

On 10-year performance, FEZ leads with 11.24% vs -0.29% for SDIV. On fees, FEZ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FEZ has performed better with a 11.24% return vs -0.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEZ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SDIV.

SDIV has the higher dividend yield at 9.05%, compared with 2.53% for FEZ.

SDIV is categorized as Global Equities, while FEZ is Europe Equities. SDIV tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend Index, while FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SDIV and 0.29% for FEZ.

SDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDIV and FEZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer