PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDIV vs. FEZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDIV vs. FEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDIV achieves a 5.97% return, which is significantly higher than FEZ's 5.18% return. Over the past 10 years, SDIV has underperformed FEZ with an annualized return of -0.07%, while FEZ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.28% annualized return.


SDIV

1D
-2.00%
1M
-3.86%
YTD
5.97%
6M
6.19%
1Y
25.09%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
-0.84%
10Y*
-0.07%

FEZ

1D
-1.26%
1M
5.21%
YTD
5.18%
6M
6.87%
1Y
16.91%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
9.90%
10Y*
10.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDIV vs. FEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDIV
Global X SuperDividend ETF
5.97%29.12%1.77%5.46%-26.43%3.76%-20.89%13.04%-15.07%11.95%
FEZ
SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
5.18%37.81%3.57%27.16%-14.27%14.84%4.84%26.04%-15.85%24.80%

Correlation

The correlation between SDIV and FEZ is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2011

0.74

The correlation between SDIV and FEZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

SDIV vs. FEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDIV
FEZ

Real Estate

36.2%

-

Energy

18.4%
5.0%

Industrials

14.3%
20.1%

Financial Services

8.9%
23.4%

Communication Services

6.1%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
5.4%

Basic Materials

2.8%
3.5%

Technology

1.6%
17.9%

Healthcare

1.4%
5.2%

Utilities

1.1%
4.6%

Real Estate

SDIV
36.2%
FEZ

-

Energy

SDIV
18.4%
FEZ
5.0%

Industrials

SDIV
14.3%
FEZ
20.1%

Financial Services

SDIV
8.9%
FEZ
23.4%

Communication Services

SDIV
6.1%
FEZ
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SDIV
5.5%
FEZ
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

SDIV
3.7%
FEZ
5.4%

Basic Materials

SDIV
2.8%
FEZ
3.5%

Technology

SDIV
1.6%
FEZ
17.9%

Healthcare

SDIV
1.4%
FEZ
5.2%

Utilities

SDIV
1.1%
FEZ
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDIV vs. FEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDIV
SDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

FEZ
FEZ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDIV vs. FEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDIVFEZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.17

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

1.25

+2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.41

4.25

+8.16

SDIV vs. FEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the FEZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDIV and FEZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDIVFEZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

0.95

+1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.48

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

0.49

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.30

-0.24

Drawdowns

SDIV vs. FEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDIV drawdown since its inception was -56.90%, smaller than the maximum FEZ drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDIV and FEZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDIVFEZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.90%

-64.21%

+7.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

-13.63%

+6.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.64%

-15.85%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.94%

-35.05%

-6.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.90%

-39.69%

-17.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.77%

-2.33%

-15.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.59%

-17.07%

-1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

3.99%

-1.96%

Volatility

SDIV vs. FEZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) is 4.21%, while SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) has a volatility of 6.72%. This indicates that SDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDIVFEZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

6.72%

-2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.64%

14.85%

-5.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.47%

17.91%

-5.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.86%

20.61%

-3.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.97%

21.11%

-2.14%

SDIV vs. FEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDIV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than FEZ's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDIV vs. FEZ - Dividend Comparison

SDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.02%, more than FEZ's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEZ
SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
2.57%2.78%2.94%2.75%3.06%2.61%2.13%2.61%3.45%2.44%3.35%3.03%
SDIV
Global X SuperDividend ETF
10.02%9.59%11.33%11.73%14.17%8.95%7.96%8.73%9.22%6.66%6.95%7.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDIV and FEZ have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEZ has higher volatility (6.72%) compared to SDIV (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDIV dropped -56.90% vs FEZ's -64.21%.

On 10-year performance, FEZ leads with 10.28% vs -0.07% for SDIV. On fees, FEZ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FEZ has performed better with a 10.28% return vs -0.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEZ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SDIV.

SDIV has the higher dividend yield at 10.02%, compared with 2.57% for FEZ.

SDIV is categorized as Global Equities, while FEZ is Europe Equities. SDIV tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend Index, while FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SDIV and 0.29% for FEZ.

SDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDIV and FEZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer