SDHC vs. FXAIX
SDHC (Smith Douglas Homes Corp) is a stock, while FXAIX (Fidelity 500 Index Fund) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past year, SDHC returned -32.89% vs 28.99% for FXAIX. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SDHC vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDHC achieves a -24.21% return, which is significantly lower than FXAIX's 11.71% return.
SDHC
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- -24.21%
- 6M
- -40.86%
- 1Y
- -32.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXAIX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 5.80%
- YTD
- 11.71%
- 6M
- 11.74%
- 1Y
- 28.99%
- 3Y*
- 22.75%
- 5Y*
- 14.28%
- 10Y*
- 15.66%
SDHC vs. FXAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SDHC Smith Douglas Homes Corp | -24.21% | -34.59% | 6.83% |
FXAIX Fidelity 500 Index Fund | 11.71% | 17.84% | 24.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDHC and FXAIX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDHC vs. FXAIX — Risk / Return Rank
SDHC
FXAIX
SDHC vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Smith Douglas Homes Corp (SDHC) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDHC | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | 2.52 | -3.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | 3.42 | -3.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.46 | -0.52 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 3.36 | -3.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 15.70 | -16.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDHC | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | 2.52 | -3.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.43 | 0.82 | -1.25 |
Drawdowns
SDHC vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDHC drawdown since its inception was -71.98%, which is greater than FXAIX's maximum drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDHC and FXAIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDHC | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.98% | -33.79% | -38.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.01% | -8.89% | -43.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.15% | 0.00% | -67.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.57% | -3.79% | -31.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.42% | 1.90% | +24.52% |
Volatility
SDHC vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison
Smith Douglas Homes Corp (SDHC) has a higher volatility of 16.10% compared to Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) at 2.83%. This indicates that SDHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDHC | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.10% | 2.83% | +13.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.70% | 8.97% | +35.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.20% | 11.86% | +48.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.65% | 16.91% | +37.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.65% | 18.07% | +36.58% |
Dividends
SDHC vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison
SDHC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FXAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXAIX Fidelity 500 Index Fund | 1.03% | 1.11% | 1.25% | 1.45% | 1.69% | 1.22% | 1.60% | 2.06% | 2.72% | 1.97% | 2.52% | 2.83% |
SDHC Smith Douglas Homes Corp | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDHC and FXAIX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SDHC has higher volatility (16.10%) compared to FXAIX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDHC dropped -71.98% vs FXAIX's -33.79%.
FXAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDHC and FXAIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer