PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SDHC vs. DGRO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SDHC and DGRO is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

SDHC vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Smith Douglas Homes Corp (SDHC) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-33.95%
6.89%
SDHC
DGRO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SDHC:

-0.32

DGRO:

1.88

Sortino Ratio

SDHC:

-0.15

DGRO:

2.65

Omega Ratio

SDHC:

0.98

DGRO:

1.34

Calmar Ratio

SDHC:

-0.37

DGRO:

2.93

Martin Ratio

SDHC:

-0.77

DGRO:

8.91

Ulcer Index

SDHC:

19.66%

DGRO:

2.08%

Daily Std Dev

SDHC:

48.17%

DGRO:

9.90%

Max Drawdown

SDHC:

-41.69%

DGRO:

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

SDHC:

-38.54%

DGRO:

-0.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDHC achieves a -7.25% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 4.76% return.


SDHC

YTD

-7.25%

1M

-4.96%

6M

-33.94%

1Y

-16.24%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

DGRO

YTD

4.76%

1M

1.82%

6M

6.89%

1Y

18.24%

5Y*

11.28%

10Y*

11.79%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SDHC vs. DGRO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDHC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SDHC is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SDHC is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SDHC is 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SDHC is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SDHC is 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SDHC is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DGRO is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DGRO is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DGRO is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DGRO is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DGRO is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DGRO is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SDHC vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Smith Douglas Homes Corp (SDHC) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SDHC, currently valued at -0.32, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.00-0.321.88
The chart of Sortino ratio for SDHC, currently valued at -0.15, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.152.65
The chart of Omega ratio for SDHC, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.981.34
The chart of Calmar ratio for SDHC, currently valued at -0.37, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.372.93
The chart of Martin ratio for SDHC, currently valued at -0.77, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.778.91
SDHC
DGRO

The current SDHC Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDHC and DGRO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00Thu 16Sat 18Mon 20Wed 22Fri 24Jan 26Tue 28Thu 30FebruaryMon 03Wed 05Fri 07Feb 09Tue 11Thu 13Sat 15Mon 17Wed 19
-0.32
1.88
SDHC
DGRO

Dividends

SDHC vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

SDHC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SDHC
Smith Douglas Homes Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
2.16%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%0.97%

Drawdowns

SDHC vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDHC drawdown since its inception was -41.69%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDHC and DGRO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-38.54%
-0.45%
SDHC
DGRO

Volatility

SDHC vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

Smith Douglas Homes Corp (SDHC) has a higher volatility of 13.49% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.44%. This indicates that SDHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
13.49%
2.44%
SDHC
DGRO
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab