SDGR vs. SCHX
SDGR (Schrodinger, Inc.) is a stock, while SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 5 years, SDGR returned -25.32%/yr vs 12.71%/yr for SCHX. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SDGR vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDGR achieves a -12.75% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 10.64% return.
SDGR
- 1D
- -4.12%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- 6M
- -10.70%
- YTD
- -12.75%
- 1Y
- -26.59%
- 3Y*
- -34.11%
- 5Y*
- -25.32%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 8.78%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 1Y
- 21.14%
- 3Y*
- 19.98%
- 5Y*
- 12.71%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
SDGR vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDGR Schrodinger, Inc. | -12.75% | -7.31% | -46.12% | 91.55% | -46.34% | -56.01% | 204.54% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 10.64% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 16.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDGR and SCHX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2020 | 0.44 |
The correlation between SDGR and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDGR vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
SDGR
SCHX
SDGR vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schrodinger, Inc. (SDGR) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDGR | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.30 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | 2.35 | -2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | 10.08 | -10.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDGR vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDGR drawdown since its inception was -90.21%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDGR and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDGR | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.21% | -34.33% | -55.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.93% | -9.02% | -42.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -80.01% | -19.04% | -60.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.47% | -25.41% | -59.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.21% | -0.77% | -85.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.38% | -3.95% | -60.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.13% | 2.10% | +30.03% |
Volatility
SDGR vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
Schrodinger, Inc. (SDGR) has a higher volatility of 14.74% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) at 3.30%. This indicates that SDGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDGR | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.74% | 3.30% | +11.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.26% | 10.02% | +29.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.46% | 12.67% | +39.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.51% | 17.23% | +46.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.72% | 18.13% | +51.59% |
Dividends
SDGR vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
SDGR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.02% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
SDGR Schrodinger, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDGR and SCHX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SDGR has higher volatility (14.74%) compared to SCHX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDGR dropped -90.21% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDGR and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer