SDGR vs. SCHX
SDGR (Schrodinger, Inc.) is a stock, while SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 5 years, SDGR returned -26.96%/yr vs 12.33%/yr for SCHX. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SDGR vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDGR achieves a -9.73% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 7.91% return.
SDGR
- 1D
- 5.28%
- 1M
- 22.74%
- YTD
- -9.73%
- 6M
- -12.19%
- 1Y
- -21.50%
- 3Y*
- -27.18%
- 5Y*
- -26.96%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- 7.91%
- 6M
- 6.56%
- 1Y
- 21.54%
- 3Y*
- 20.85%
- 5Y*
- 12.33%
- 10Y*
- 15.68%
SDGR vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDGR Schrodinger, Inc. | -9.73% | -7.31% | -46.12% | 91.55% | -46.34% | -56.01% | 204.54% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 7.91% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 16.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDGR and SCHX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2020 | 0.45 |
The correlation between SDGR and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDGR vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
SDGR
SCHX
SDGR vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schrodinger, Inc. (SDGR) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDGR | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.31 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 2.40 | -2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.69 | 10.41 | -11.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDGR vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDGR drawdown since its inception was -90.21%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDGR and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDGR | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.21% | -34.33% | -55.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.93% | -9.02% | -42.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -80.01% | -19.04% | -60.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.95% | -25.41% | -60.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.73% | -3.22% | -82.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.19% | -3.96% | -60.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.43% | 2.07% | +29.36% |
Volatility
SDGR vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
Schrodinger, Inc. (SDGR) has a higher volatility of 18.84% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) at 4.80%. This indicates that SDGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDGR | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.84% | 4.80% | +14.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.90% | 9.88% | +28.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.69% | 12.57% | +39.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.45% | 17.22% | +46.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.86% | 18.16% | +51.70% |
Dividends
SDGR vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
SDGR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.05% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
SDGR Schrodinger, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDGR and SCHX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SDGR has higher volatility (18.84%) compared to SCHX (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDGR dropped -90.21% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDGR and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer