PortfoliosLab logo
SDGR vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SDGR and COST is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

SDGR vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schrodinger, Inc. (SDGR) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SDGR:

-0.01

COST:

1.29

Sortino Ratio

SDGR:

0.47

COST:

1.81

Omega Ratio

SDGR:

1.05

COST:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

SDGR:

-0.03

COST:

1.65

Martin Ratio

SDGR:

-0.13

COST:

4.74

Ulcer Index

SDGR:

16.45%

COST:

6.04%

Daily Std Dev

SDGR:

66.35%

COST:

22.13%

Max Drawdown

SDGR:

-85.64%

COST:

-53.39%

Current Drawdown

SDGR:

-80.88%

COST:

-3.28%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SDGR:

$1.57B

COST:

$461.51B

EPS

SDGR:

-$2.63

COST:

$17.68

PS Ratio

SDGR:

6.83

COST:

1.72

PB Ratio

SDGR:

4.25

COST:

18.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

SDGR:

$230.49M

COST:

$205.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SDGR:

$144.32M

COST:

$27.77B

EBITDA (TTM)

SDGR:

-$188.03M

COST:

$8.41B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDGR achieves a 12.08% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 13.80% return.


SDGR

YTD

12.08%

1M

-13.10%

6M

-4.21%

1Y

0.46%

3Y*

-5.77%

5Y*

-20.59%

10Y*

N/A

COST

YTD

13.80%

1M

4.25%

6M

7.29%

1Y

29.10%

3Y*

32.50%

5Y*

29.64%

10Y*

24.24%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Schrodinger, Inc.

Costco Wholesale Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SDGR vs. COST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDGR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SDGR is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SDGR is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SDGR is 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SDGR is 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SDGR is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SDGR is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COST is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COST is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COST is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COST is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COST is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COST is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SDGR vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schrodinger, Inc. (SDGR) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SDGR Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDGR and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

SDGR vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

SDGR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SDGR
Schrodinger, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.46%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%

Drawdowns

SDGR vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDGR drawdown since its inception was -85.64%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDGR and COST.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

SDGR vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Schrodinger, Inc. (SDGR) has a higher volatility of 15.56% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 5.12%. This indicates that SDGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

SDGR vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Schrodinger, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20212022202320242025
59.55M
63.72B
(SDGR) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items