SCYB vs. FIBUX
SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) and FIBUX (Fidelity Flex U.S. Bond Index Fund) are both funds - SCYB is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while FIBUX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past year, SCYB returned 6.36% vs 4.25% for FIBUX. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCYB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FIBUX.
Performance
SCYB vs. FIBUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCYB achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly higher than FIBUX's 0.13% return.
SCYB
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 6.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIBUX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 4.25%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- -0.09%
- 10Y*
- —
SCYB vs. FIBUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 1.84% | 8.33% | 8.15% | 7.29% |
FIBUX Fidelity Flex U.S. Bond Index Fund | 0.13% | 7.20% | 1.31% | 4.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCYB and FIBUX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2023 | 0.57 |
The correlation between SCYB and FIBUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCYB vs. FIBUX — Risk / Return Rank
SCYB
FIBUX
SCYB vs. FIBUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) and Fidelity Flex U.S. Bond Index Fund (FIBUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCYB | FIBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.20 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 1.52 | +1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.63 | 4.23 | +7.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCYB vs. FIBUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCYB drawdown since its inception was -4.92%, smaller than the maximum FIBUX drawdown of -19.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCYB and FIBUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCYB | FIBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -19.76% | +14.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.44% | -2.97% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -3.75% | +3.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.51% | -5.78% | +5.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.55% | 1.06% | -0.51% |
Volatility
SCYB vs. FIBUX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) is 1.01%, while Fidelity Flex U.S. Bond Index Fund (FIBUX) has a volatility of 1.11%. This indicates that SCYB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIBUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCYB | FIBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.01% | 1.11% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.01% | 2.90% | +0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.79% | 3.97% | -0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.11% | 6.04% | -0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.11% | 5.11% | 0.00% |
SCYB vs. FIBUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCYB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FIBUX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCYB vs. FIBUX - Dividend Comparison
SCYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, more than FIBUX's 4.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIBUX Fidelity Flex U.S. Bond Index Fund | 4.09% | 3.95% | 3.65% | 2.93% | 1.62% | 1.18% | 2.32% | 2.96% | 2.70% | 2.45% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 6.92% | 6.99% | 7.06% | 3.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCYB and FIBUX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIBUX has higher volatility (1.11%) compared to SCYB (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCYB dropped -4.92% vs FIBUX's -19.76%.
SCYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCYB and FIBUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer