SCMBX vs. ICVT
SCMBX (DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund) and ICVT (iShares Convertible Bond ETF) are both funds - SCMBX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by BlackRock, while ICVT is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Barclays U.S. Convertible Cash Pay Bond > $250MM Index. Over the past 10 years, SCMBX returned 1.82%/yr vs 13.99%/yr for ICVT. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCMBX charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ICVT.
Performance
SCMBX vs. ICVT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCMBX achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly lower than ICVT's 25.28% return. Over the past 10 years, SCMBX has underperformed ICVT with an annualized return of 1.82%, while ICVT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.99% annualized return.
SCMBX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 7.06%
- 3Y*
- 3.73%
- 5Y*
- 0.13%
- 10Y*
- 1.82%
ICVT
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 7.16%
- YTD
- 25.28%
- 6M
- 24.31%
- 1Y
- 42.20%
- 3Y*
- 21.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
SCMBX vs. ICVT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCMBX DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund | 1.64% | 3.21% | 2.52% | 6.64% | -12.83% | 2.09% | 4.72% | 8.93% | 0.21% | 5.58% |
ICVT iShares Convertible Bond ETF | 25.28% | 18.10% | 10.61% | 15.35% | -20.66% | -0.66% | 61.01% | 21.76% | -0.27% | 16.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCMBX and ICVT is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2015 | 0.05 |
The correlation between SCMBX and ICVT shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.16 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCMBX vs. ICVT — Risk / Return Rank
SCMBX
ICVT
SCMBX vs. ICVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund (SCMBX) and iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCMBX | ICVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.52 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 5.62 | -3.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.99 | 20.48 | -12.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCMBX | ICVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38 | 2.95 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 0.59 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.91 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.27 | 0.78 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
SCMBX vs. ICVT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCMBX drawdown since its inception was -18.17%, smaller than the maximum ICVT drawdown of -33.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCMBX and ICVT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCMBX | ICVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.17% | -33.25% | +15.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.96% | -7.55% | +4.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.02% | -11.22% | +4.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.17% | -29.95% | +11.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.17% | -33.25% | +15.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | -0.97% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -9.50% | +7.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | 2.07% | -1.18% |
Volatility
SCMBX vs. ICVT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund (SCMBX) is 1.22%, while iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) has a volatility of 5.53%. This indicates that SCMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCMBX | ICVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | 5.53% | -4.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.31% | 11.69% | -9.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.02% | 14.36% | -11.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.41% | 13.23% | -8.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.32% | 15.50% | -11.18% |
SCMBX vs. ICVT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCMBX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than ICVT's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCMBX vs. ICVT - Dividend Comparison
SCMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than ICVT's 1.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICVT iShares Convertible Bond ETF | 1.30% | 1.73% | 2.19% | 1.85% | 1.93% | 7.70% | 3.98% | 1.86% | 4.82% | 2.56% | 3.06% | 1.57% |
SCMBX DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund | 3.74% | 4.46% | 3.49% | 2.64% | 2.36% | 3.27% | 3.57% | 4.32% | 3.42% | 3.31% | 3.87% | 3.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCMBX and ICVT have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICVT has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to SCMBX (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCMBX dropped -18.17% vs ICVT's -33.25%.
ICVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCMBX and ICVT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer