SCMBX vs. ICVT
Compare and contrast key facts about DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund (SCMBX) and iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT).
SCMBX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 13, 1976. ICVT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. Convertible Cash Pay Bond > $250MM Index. It was launched on Jun 2, 2015.
Performance
SCMBX vs. ICVT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SCMBX vs. ICVT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCMBX DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund | -0.34% | 3.21% | 2.52% | 6.64% | -12.83% | 2.09% | 4.72% | 8.93% | 0.21% | 5.58% |
ICVT iShares Convertible Bond ETF | 3.58% | 18.10% | 10.61% | 15.35% | -20.66% | -0.66% | 61.01% | 21.76% | -0.27% | 16.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCMBX achieves a -0.34% return, which is significantly lower than ICVT's 3.58% return. Over the past 10 years, SCMBX has underperformed ICVT with an annualized return of 1.75%, while ICVT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.24% annualized return.
SCMBX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 3.84%
- 3Y*
- 2.95%
- 5Y*
- 0.13%
- 10Y*
- 1.75%
ICVT
- 1D
- 2.66%
- 1M
- -2.73%
- YTD
- 3.58%
- 6M
- 2.56%
- 1Y
- 23.90%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- 3.55%
- 10Y*
- 12.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCMBX vs. ICVT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCMBX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than ICVT's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SCMBX vs. ICVT — Risk / Return Rank
SCMBX
ICVT
SCMBX vs. ICVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund (SCMBX) and iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCMBX | ICVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 1.71 | -0.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.07 | 2.33 | -1.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.32 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | 3.10 | -2.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.62 | 10.57 | -7.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCMBX | ICVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 1.71 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 0.27 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.79 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 0.67 | +0.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between SCMBX and ICVT is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SCMBX vs. ICVT - Dividend Comparison
SCMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, more than ICVT's 1.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCMBX DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund | 4.89% | 4.46% | 3.49% | 2.64% | 2.36% | 3.27% | 3.57% | 4.32% | 3.42% | 3.31% | 3.87% | 3.99% |
ICVT iShares Convertible Bond ETF | 1.62% | 1.73% | 2.19% | 1.85% | 1.93% | 7.70% | 3.98% | 1.86% | 4.82% | 2.56% | 3.06% | 1.57% |
Drawdowns
SCMBX vs. ICVT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCMBX drawdown since its inception was -18.17%, smaller than the maximum ICVT drawdown of -33.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCMBX and ICVT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCMBX | ICVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.17% | -33.25% | +15.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.07% | -7.55% | +2.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.17% | -29.95% | +11.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.17% | -33.25% | +15.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.50% | -3.67% | +1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -9.64% | +7.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 2.21% | -0.65% |
Volatility
SCMBX vs. ICVT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund (SCMBX) is 1.25%, while iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) has a volatility of 6.74%. This indicates that SCMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SCMBX | ICVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | 6.74% | -5.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.91% | 11.65% | -9.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.24% | 14.02% | -8.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.37% | 13.20% | -8.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.30% | 15.54% | -11.24% |