PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCJ vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCJ vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCJ achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, SCJ has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 7.55%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.


SCJ

1D
0.36%
1M
5.04%
YTD
14.35%
6M
16.37%
1Y
30.15%
3Y*
17.70%
5Y*
7.36%
10Y*
7.55%

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCJ vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCJ
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF
14.35%29.58%3.41%13.22%-12.75%-2.95%7.46%16.16%-17.17%31.61%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SCJ and VOO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.59

The correlation between SCJ and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCJ vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCJ
VOO

Industrials

28.9%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

14.6%
10.2%

Technology

11.2%
35.7%

Basic Materials

10.1%
1.8%

Financial Services

9.7%
11.6%

Real Estate

8.4%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
4.9%

Healthcare

4.4%
8.5%

Communication Services

2.9%
11.3%

Utilities

2.1%
2.4%

Energy

0.8%
3.5%

Industrials

SCJ
28.9%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SCJ
14.6%
VOO
10.2%

Technology

SCJ
11.2%
VOO
35.7%

Basic Materials

SCJ
10.1%
VOO
1.8%

Financial Services

SCJ
9.7%
VOO
11.6%

Real Estate

SCJ
8.4%
VOO
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

SCJ
6.8%
VOO
4.9%

Healthcare

SCJ
4.4%
VOO
8.5%

Communication Services

SCJ
2.9%
VOO
11.3%

Utilities

SCJ
2.1%
VOO
2.4%

Energy

SCJ
0.8%
VOO
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCJ vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCJ
SCJ Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCJ vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCJVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.43

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

3.16

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.42

14.73

-6.31

SCJ vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCJ and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCJVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

2.39

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.83

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.87

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.89

-0.58

Drawdowns

SCJ vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCJ drawdown since its inception was -43.52%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCJ and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCJVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.52%

-33.99%

-9.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.17%

-8.90%

-3.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.43%

-18.69%

+6.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.25%

-24.52%

-8.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.87%

-33.99%

-4.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-0.70%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.38%

-3.69%

-6.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

1.91%

+1.68%

Volatility

SCJ vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that SCJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCJVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

2.84%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.13%

8.90%

+4.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.11%

11.80%

+4.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.81%

16.81%

-1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.29%

18.01%

-1.72%

SCJ vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCJ vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

SCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCJ
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF
2.75%3.14%1.79%1.99%1.18%1.87%0.89%1.85%1.44%1.45%2.73%1.53%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCJ and VOO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCJ has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCJ dropped -43.52% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.56% vs 7.55% for SCJ. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 7.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SCJ.

SCJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

SCJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. SCJ tracks MSCI Japan Small Cap Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SCJ and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCJ and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer