SCJ vs. EWL
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) and iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL).
SCJ and EWL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCJ is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Japan Small Cap Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2007. EWL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Switzerland Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 1996. Both SCJ and EWL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SCJ or EWL.
Correlation
The correlation between SCJ and EWL is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SCJ vs. EWL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SCJ:
0.37
EWL:
-0.10
SCJ:
0.61
EWL:
-0.06
SCJ:
1.07
EWL:
0.99
SCJ:
0.33
EWL:
-0.10
SCJ:
1.36
EWL:
-0.30
SCJ:
4.19%
EWL:
4.46%
SCJ:
15.42%
EWL:
12.71%
SCJ:
-43.52%
EWL:
-51.62%
SCJ:
-12.34%
EWL:
-13.47%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCJ achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly higher than EWL's -3.29% return. Over the past 10 years, SCJ has underperformed EWL with an annualized return of 5.27%, while EWL has yielded a comparatively higher 5.75% annualized return.
SCJ
1.61%
-1.06%
2.77%
5.41%
0.79%
5.27%
EWL
-3.29%
-3.11%
-6.98%
-0.06%
4.59%
5.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCJ vs. EWL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than EWL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SCJ vs. EWL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) and iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SCJ vs. EWL - Dividend Comparison
SCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than EWL's 2.22% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCJ iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF | 0.99% | 1.99% | 1.18% | 1.87% | 0.89% | 4.46% | 1.44% | 1.45% | 2.73% | 1.53% | 2.31% | 1.85% |
EWL iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF | 2.22% | 2.12% | 2.04% | 1.73% | 1.45% | 1.85% | 2.56% | 2.05% | 2.75% | 2.58% | 2.49% | 1.83% |
Drawdowns
SCJ vs. EWL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCJ drawdown since its inception was -43.52%, smaller than the maximum EWL drawdown of -51.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCJ and EWL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SCJ vs. EWL - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) at 3.74%. This indicates that SCJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.