SCI vs. WM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Service Corporation International (SCI) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM).

Performance

SCI vs. WM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Service Corporation International (SCI) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SCI vs. WM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCI Service Corporation International	6.28%	-0.70%	18.42%	0.74%	-1.04%	46.81%	8.58%	16.22%	9.73%	33.69%
WM Waste Management, Inc.	5.00%	10.50%	14.28%	16.20%	-4.49%	43.82%	5.46%	30.45%	5.32%	24.46%

Fundamentals

Market Cap SCI : $11.64B WM : $92.95B
EPS SCI : $4.53 WM : $6.70
PE Ratio SCI : 18.23 WM : 34.31
PEG Ratio SCI : 1.31 WM : 2.81
PS Ratio SCI : 2.73 WM : 3.69
PB Ratio SCI : 7.11 WM : 9.30
Total Revenue (TTM) SCI : $4.31B WM : $25.20B
Gross Profit (TTM) SCI : $1.14B WM : $7.33B
EBITDA (TTM) SCI : $1.16B WM : $7.27B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCI achieves a 6.28% return, which is significantly higher than WM's 5.00% return. Over the past 10 years, SCI has underperformed WM with an annualized return of 14.74%, while WM has yielded a comparatively higher 16.64% annualized return.

SCI

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: -1.56%
• YTD: 6.28%
• 6M: 0.01%
• 1Y: 4.61%
• 3Y*: 8.01%
• 5Y*: 11.29%
• 10Y*: 14.74%

WM

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -4.21%
• YTD: 5.00%
• 6M: 4.88%
• 1Y: 0.76%
• 3Y*: 13.82%
• 5Y*: 13.95%
• 10Y*: 16.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SCI vs. WM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCI

SCI Risk / Return Rank: 48
SCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
SCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
SCI Omega Ratio Rank: 41
SCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
SCI Martin Ratio Rank: 54

WM

WM Risk / Return Rank: 41
WM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
WM Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
WM Omega Ratio Rank: 35
WM Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
WM Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCI vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Service Corporation International (SCI) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCI	WM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.21	0.04	+0.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.44	0.18	+0.26
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.02	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.45	0.13	+0.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.08	0.31	+0.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCI vs. WM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCI Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is higher than the WM Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCI and WM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCI	WM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21	0.04	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	0.77	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	0.86	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.37	-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between SCI and WM is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SCI vs. WM - Dividend Comparison

SCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than WM's 1.49% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCI Service Corporation International	1.60%	1.67%	1.50%	1.64%	1.48%	1.24%	1.59%	1.56%	1.69%	1.55%	1.80%	1.69%
WM Waste Management, Inc.	1.49%	1.50%	1.49%	1.56%	1.66%	1.38%	1.85%	1.80%	2.09%	1.97%	2.31%	2.89%

Drawdowns

SCI vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCI drawdown since its inception was -96.51%, which is greater than WM's maximum drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCI and WM.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCI	WM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.51%	-77.85%	-18.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.55%	-18.14%	+6.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.14%	-18.14%	-9.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.03%	-30.07%	-3.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.59%	-6.41%	+1.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.58%	-17.74%	-21.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.79%	7.53%	-2.74%

Volatility

SCI vs. WM - Volatility Comparison

Service Corporation International (SCI) has a higher volatility of 7.82% compared to Waste Management, Inc. (WM) at 5.94%. This indicates that SCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCI	WM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.82%	5.94%	+1.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.84%	13.99%	+1.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.93%	19.06%	+2.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.67%	18.30%	+6.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.01%	19.38%	+5.63%

Financials

SCI vs. WM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Service Corporation International and Waste Management, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SCI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Service Corporation International reported a gross profit of 311.68M and revenue of 1.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.0%.

WM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.85B and revenue of 6.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.3%.

SCI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Service Corporation International reported an operating income of 275.55M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.8%.

WM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.18B and revenue of 6.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.

SCI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Service Corporation International reported a net income of 263.06M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in a net margin of 23.7%.

WM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported a net income of 742.00M and revenue of 6.31B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.