SCI vs. MSFT
SCI (Service Corporation International) and MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) are both stocks. SCI operates in Personal Services (Consumer Cyclical), while MSFT operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 10 years, SCI returned 14.26%/yr vs 24.97%/yr for MSFT. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SCI vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCI achieves a 11.54% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -3.48% return. Over the past 10 years, SCI has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 14.26%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.97% annualized return.
SCI
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 9.71%
- 6M
- 8.13%
- YTD
- 11.54%
- 1Y
- 12.68%
- 3Y*
- 10.43%
- 5Y*
- 8.39%
- 10Y*
- 14.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.40%
MSFT
- 1D
- 3.02%
- 1M
- 19.01%
- 6M
- 8.48%
- YTD
- -3.48%
- 1Y
- -10.62%
- 3Y*
- 12.25%
- 5Y*
- 11.19%
- 10Y*
- 24.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 25.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $17.39B | $14.79B | $16.23B | |
| $119.58M | $100.97M | $114.64M |
SCI vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCI Service Corporation International | 11.54% | -0.70% | 18.42% | 0.74% | -1.04% | 46.81% | 8.58% | 16.22% | 9.73% | 33.69% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -3.48% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 42.53% | 57.56% | 20.80% | 40.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCI and MSFT is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 1987 | 0.25 |
The correlation between SCI and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.27 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SCI:
$11.91B
MSFT:
$3.45T
SCI:
$5.06
MSFT:
$17.94
SCI:
17.05
MSFT:
25.91
SCI:
2.78
MSFT:
10.44
SCI:
7.80
MSFT:
7.83
SCI:
$4.37B
MSFT:
$331.84B
SCI:
$1.14B
MSFT:
$225.47B
SCI:
$822.86M
MSFT:
$207.52B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCI vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
SCI
MSFT
SCI vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Service Corporation International (SCI) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCI | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.95 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.69 | -0.35 | +1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.99 | -0.63 | +2.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCI vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCI drawdown since its inception was -96.51%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCI and MSFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCI | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.51% | -69.38% | -27.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.61% | -34.50% | +12.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.61% | -34.50% | +12.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.14% | -37.15% | +10.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.03% | -37.15% | +3.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.29% | -13.73% | +12.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.32% | -21.80% | -17.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.52% | 19.35% | -11.83% |
Volatility
SCI vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Service Corporation International (SCI) is 7.50%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 15.97%. This indicates that SCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCI | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.50% | 15.97% | -8.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.52% | 26.41% | -5.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.86% | 31.93% | -8.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.02% | 28.00% | -2.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.34% | 27.62% | -2.28% |
Dividends
SCI vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
SCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than MSFT's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.77% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
SCI Service Corporation International | 1.58% | 1.67% | 1.50% | 1.64% | 1.48% | 1.24% | 1.59% | 1.56% | 1.69% | 1.55% | 1.80% | 1.69% |
Financials
SCI vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Service Corporation International and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SCI vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison
SCI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Service Corporation International reported a gross profit of 273.50M and revenue of 1.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.8%.
MSFT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 60.48B and revenue of 90.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.
SCI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Service Corporation International reported an operating income of 232.86M and revenue of 1.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.
MSFT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 40.60B and revenue of 90.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.1%.
SCI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Service Corporation International reported a net income of 208.76M and revenue of 1.10B, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.
MSFT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 35.77B and revenue of 90.01B, resulting in a net margin of 39.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SCI and MSFT have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFT has higher volatility (15.97%) compared to SCI (7.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCI dropped -96.51% vs MSFT's -69.38%.
SCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCI and MSFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer