PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCI vs. MATW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SCI vs. MATW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Service Corporation International (SCI) and Matthews International Corporation (MATW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCI achieves a -5.32% return, which is significantly lower than MATW's 1.87% return. Over the past 10 years, SCI has outperformed MATW with an annualized return of 12.70%, while MATW has yielded a comparatively lower -4.38% annualized return.


SCI

1D
0.74%
1M
-5.02%
YTD
-5.32%
6M
-6.23%
1Y
-5.26%
3Y*
6.55%
5Y*
8.80%
10Y*
12.70%

MATW

1D
-0.91%
1M
-2.39%
YTD
1.87%
6M
2.30%
1Y
29.23%
3Y*
-9.69%
5Y*
-2.96%
10Y*
-4.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCI vs. MATW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCI
Service Corporation International
-5.32%-0.70%18.42%0.74%-1.04%46.81%8.58%16.22%9.73%33.69%
MATW
Matthews International Corporation
1.87%-1.50%-21.25%23.36%-14.50%27.72%-20.49%-3.95%-21.88%-30.53%

Correlation

The correlation between SCI and MATW is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 1994

0.31

The correlation between SCI and MATW shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.40 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

SCI:

$4.41

MATW:

$0.41

PE Ratio

SCI:

16.60

MATW:

63.04

PS Ratio

SCI:

2.40

MATW:

0.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

SCI:

$4.33B

MATW:

$1.21B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SCI:

$1.14B

MATW:

$432.86M

EBITDA (TTM)

SCI:

$1.16B

MATW:

$201.65M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCI vs. MATW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCI
SCI Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCI Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
SCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCI Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

MATW
MATW Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
MATW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MATW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MATW Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
MATW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MATW Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCI vs. MATW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Service Corporation International (SCI) and Matthews International Corporation (MATW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCIMATWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.17

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

1.85

-2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.77

4.26

-5.03

SCI vs. MATW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCI Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the MATW Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCI and MATW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCI vs. MATW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCI drawdown since its inception was -96.51%, which is greater than MATW's maximum drawdown of -75.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCI and MATW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCIMATWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.51%

-75.27%

-21.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.61%

-15.87%

-5.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.61%

-58.68%

+37.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.14%

-58.68%

+31.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.03%

-75.27%

+41.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.22%

-55.94%

+39.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.41%

-24.75%

-14.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.82%

6.88%

-0.06%

Volatility

SCI vs. MATW - Volatility Comparison

Service Corporation International (SCI) has a higher volatility of 9.46% compared to Matthews International Corporation (MATW) at 8.62%. This indicates that SCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MATW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCIMATWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.46%

8.62%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.87%

21.67%

-2.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.89%

33.95%

-11.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.95%

36.34%

-11.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.27%

36.97%

-11.70%

Dividends

SCI vs. MATW - Dividend Comparison

SCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than MATW's 3.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MATW
Matthews International Corporation
3.89%3.85%4.37%2.54%2.92%2.36%2.87%2.12%1.90%1.33%0.81%1.01%
SCI
Service Corporation International
1.86%1.67%1.50%1.64%1.48%1.24%1.59%1.56%1.69%1.55%1.80%1.69%

Financials

SCI vs. MATW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Service Corporation International and Matthews International Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
1.10B
258.62M
(SCI) Total Revenue
(MATW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SCI vs. MATW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Service Corporation International and Matthews International Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
26.1%
39.4%
Portfolio components
SCI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Service Corporation International reported a gross profit of 286.45M and revenue of 1.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.1%.

MATW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Matthews International Corporation reported a gross profit of 101.98M and revenue of 258.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.

SCI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Service Corporation International reported an operating income of 243.81M and revenue of 1.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.2%.

MATW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Matthews International Corporation reported an operating income of -3.18M and revenue of 258.62M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.2%.

SCI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Service Corporation International reported a net income of 226.54M and revenue of 1.10B, resulting in a net margin of 20.7%.

MATW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Matthews International Corporation reported a net income of -21.83M and revenue of 258.62M, resulting in a net margin of -8.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SCI and MATW have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCI has higher volatility (9.46%) compared to MATW (8.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCI dropped -96.51% vs MATW's -75.27%.

MATW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCI and MATW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer