SCHV vs. VONG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG).

SCHV and VONG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCHV is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. VONG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010. Both SCHV and VONG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

SCHV vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SCHV vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	3.89%	16.02%	14.13%	8.93%	-7.65%	25.58%	2.64%	25.92%	-7.30%	16.56%
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	-8.97%	18.45%	33.20%	42.67%	-29.18%	27.60%	38.30%	36.06%	-1.53%	30.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHV achieves a 3.89% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's -8.97% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHV has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 10.62%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.75% annualized return.

SCHV

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: -4.32%
• YTD: 3.89%
• 6M: 6.05%
• 1Y: 17.64%
• 3Y*: 14.46%
• 5Y*: 9.37%
• 10Y*: 10.62%

VONG

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: -4.62%
• YTD: -8.97%
• 6M: -8.47%
• 1Y: 18.72%
• 3Y*: 21.47%
• 5Y*: 12.55%
• 10Y*: 16.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHV vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

VONG

Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF

SCHV

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF

Return for Risk

SCHV vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHV

SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 62
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 65
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 66

VONG

VONG Risk / Return Rank: 45
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 47
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHV vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHV	VONG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	0.84	+0.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	1.36	+0.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.19	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.48	1.22	+0.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.91	4.16	+2.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHV vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHV Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is higher than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHV and VONG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHV	VONG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15	0.84	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.59	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	0.81	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.84	-0.16

Correlation

The correlation between SCHV and VONG is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

SCHV vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

SCHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than VONG's 0.50% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	1.96%	2.02%	2.25%	2.42%	2.37%	1.93%	3.03%	3.02%	3.05%	2.37%	2.65%	2.69%
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	0.50%	0.45%	0.55%	0.71%	0.98%	0.58%	0.77%	1.03%	1.18%	1.19%	1.48%	1.47%

Drawdowns

SCHV vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHV drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHV and VONG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHV	VONG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.08%	-32.72%	-4.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.93%	-16.23%	+4.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.78%	-32.72%	+12.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.08%	-32.72%	-4.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.58%	-12.29%	+7.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.86%	-4.90%	+1.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.55%	4.78%	-2.23%

Volatility

SCHV vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) is 4.13%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that SCHV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHV	VONG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.13%	6.81%	-2.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.08%	12.37%	-4.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.42%	22.42%	-7.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.48%	21.35%	-6.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.91%	20.82%	-3.91%