SCHV vs. VONG
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG).
SCHV and VONG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCHV is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. VONG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010. Both SCHV and VONG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SCHV or VONG.
Performance
SCHV vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHV achieves a 20.72% return, which is significantly lower than VONG's 28.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHV has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 12.16%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.33% annualized return.
SCHV
20.72%
-0.55%
10.97%
30.04%
11.19%
12.16%
VONG
28.47%
1.90%
13.41%
35.48%
19.06%
16.33%
Key characteristics
| SCHV | VONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.88 | 2.15 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.03 | 2.81 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.52 | 1.40 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.47 | 2.74 |
| Martin Ratio | 17.64 | 10.82 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.69% | 3.32% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.33% | 16.70% |
| Max Drawdown | -37.08% | -32.72% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.63% | -2.80% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCHV vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VONG's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between SCHV and VONG is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SCHV vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SCHV vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
SCHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than VONG's 0.60% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 4.18% | 3.53% | 7.13% | 3.87% | 7.82% | 6.99% | 7.52% | 5.99% | 4.95% | 4.00% | 3.68% | 2.18% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.60% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% | 1.43% | 1.28% |
Drawdowns
SCHV vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHV drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHV and VONG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SCHV vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) is 3.47%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that SCHV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.