VGIT vs. SCHR
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) and Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR).
VGIT and SCHR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VGIT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. 3-10 Year Government Float Adjusted Index. It was launched on Nov 19, 2009. SCHR is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Treasury (3-10 Y). It was launched on Aug 5, 2010. Both VGIT and SCHR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VGIT or SCHR.
Performance
VGIT vs. SCHR - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGIT achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly lower than SCHR's 2.91% return. Over the past 10 years, VGIT has underperformed SCHR with an annualized return of 1.11%, while SCHR has yielded a comparatively higher 2.17% annualized return.
VGIT
1.34%
-1.01%
2.91%
4.71%
-0.24%
1.11%
SCHR
2.91%
-0.95%
3.89%
6.61%
0.94%
2.17%
Key characteristics
| VGIT | SCHR | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.95 | 1.31 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.39 | 1.95 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.17 | 1.24 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.74 | 4.28 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.70% | 1.54% |
| Daily Std Dev | 4.92% | 5.04% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.05% | -14.87% |
| Current Drawdown | -8.69% | -3.91% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VGIT vs. SCHR - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGIT has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHR's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between VGIT and SCHR is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VGIT vs. SCHR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) and Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VGIT vs. SCHR - Dividend Comparison
VGIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, less than SCHR's 5.00% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF | 3.57% | 2.72% | 1.74% | 1.69% | 2.23% | 2.24% | 2.05% | 1.67% | 1.69% | 1.69% | 1.54% | 1.63% |
SCHR Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 5.00% | 4.93% | 2.94% | 1.57% | 2.79% | 3.29% | 2.77% | 2.36% | 2.54% | 2.21% | 1.98% | 1.75% |
Drawdowns
VGIT vs. SCHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGIT drawdown since its inception was -16.05%, which is greater than SCHR's maximum drawdown of -14.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGIT and SCHR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VGIT vs. SCHR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) is 1.15%, while Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) has a volatility of 1.22%. This indicates that VGIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.