SCHQ vs. LTPZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) and PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ).
SCHQ and LTPZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCHQ is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Aggregate Government - Treasury - Long. It was launched on Oct 10, 2019. LTPZ is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y). It was launched on Sep 3, 2009. Both SCHQ and LTPZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SCHQ or LTPZ.
Performance
SCHQ vs. LTPZ - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHQ achieves a -4.49% return, which is significantly lower than LTPZ's -2.21% return.
SCHQ
-4.49%
-4.72%
1.05%
5.40%
-5.07%
N/A
LTPZ
-2.21%
-4.88%
0.95%
5.17%
-1.94%
1.12%
Key characteristics
| SCHQ | LTPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.49 | 0.46 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.78 | 0.74 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.09 | 1.08 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.16 | 0.16 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.22 | 1.45 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.42% | 4.24% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.47% | 13.36% |
| Max Drawdown | -46.13% | -40.99% |
| Current Drawdown | -38.60% | -33.84% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCHQ vs. LTPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHQ has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than LTPZ's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between SCHQ and LTPZ is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SCHQ vs. LTPZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) and PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SCHQ vs. LTPZ - Dividend Comparison
SCHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, more than LTPZ's 3.48% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 4.47% | 3.79% | 2.88% | 1.69% | 1.52% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF | 3.48% | 3.71% | 8.38% | 3.56% | 1.42% | 1.74% | 3.80% | 2.25% | 2.32% | 0.71% | 1.77% | 1.28% |
Drawdowns
SCHQ vs. LTPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHQ drawdown since its inception was -46.13%, which is greater than LTPZ's maximum drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHQ and LTPZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SCHQ vs. LTPZ - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) and PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) have volatilities of 4.36% and 4.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.