SCHP vs. SPIP
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) and SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP).
SCHP and SPIP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCHP is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) Index (Series-L). It was launched on Aug 5, 2010. SPIP is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays US Government Inflation-linked Bond Index. It was launched on May 25, 2007. Both SCHP and SPIP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SCHP or SPIP.
Key characteristics
| SCHP | SPIP | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -1.22% | -0.64% |
| 1Y Return | -1.30% | -1.65% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -1.53% | -1.80% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.21% | 2.08% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.86% | 1.80% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.15 | -0.17 |
| Daily Std Dev | 5.87% | 6.60% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.26% | -15.39% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.19% | -11.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHP and SPIP is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SCHP vs. SPIP - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SCHP achieves a -1.22% return, which is significantly lower than SPIP's -0.64% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHP having a 1.86% annualized return and SPIP not far behind at 1.80%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCHP vs. SPIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SPIP's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SCHP vs. SPIP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) and SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SCHP vs. SPIP - Dividend Comparison
SCHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than SPIP's 3.56% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 3.13% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.63% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% | 1.30% | 0.67% |
SPIP SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF | 3.56% | 3.70% | 7.05% | 4.53% | 1.97% | 2.57% | 2.80% | 3.02% | 1.88% | 0.14% | 1.66% | 1.11% |
Drawdowns
SCHP vs. SPIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHP drawdown since its inception was -14.26%, smaller than the maximum SPIP drawdown of -15.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHP and SPIP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SCHP vs. SPIP - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) and SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) have volatilities of 1.59% and 1.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.