SCHP vs. LTPZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) and PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ).
SCHP and LTPZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCHP is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) Index (Series-L). It was launched on Aug 5, 2010. LTPZ is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y). It was launched on Sep 3, 2009. Both SCHP and LTPZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SCHP or LTPZ.
Key characteristics
| SCHP | LTPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -1.22% | -6.22% |
| 1Y Return | -1.30% | -10.71% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -1.53% | -9.48% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.21% | -0.79% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.86% | 1.05% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.15 | -0.63 |
| Daily Std Dev | 5.87% | 15.91% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.26% | -40.99% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.19% | -36.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHP and LTPZ is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SCHP vs. LTPZ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SCHP achieves a -1.22% return, which is significantly higher than LTPZ's -6.22% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHP has outperformed LTPZ with an annualized return of 1.86%, while LTPZ has yielded a comparatively lower 1.05% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCHP vs. LTPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than LTPZ's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SCHP vs. LTPZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) and PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SCHP vs. LTPZ - Dividend Comparison
SCHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than LTPZ's 4.15% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 3.13% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.63% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% | 1.30% | 0.67% |
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF | 4.15% | 3.71% | 8.38% | 3.56% | 1.42% | 1.74% | 3.80% | 2.25% | 2.32% | 0.71% | 1.77% | 1.28% |
Drawdowns
SCHP vs. LTPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHP drawdown since its inception was -14.26%, smaller than the maximum LTPZ drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHP and LTPZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SCHP vs. LTPZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) is 1.59%, while PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) has a volatility of 3.85%. This indicates that SCHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.