SCHO vs. USFR
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) and WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR).
SCHO and USFR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCHO is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Treasury (1-3 Y) (Inception 4/30/1996). It was launched on Aug 5, 2010. USFR is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. It was launched on Feb 4, 2014. Both SCHO and USFR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SCHO or USFR.
Key characteristics
| SCHO | USFR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 0.36% | 2.08% |
| 1Y Return | 2.17% | 5.51% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.00% | 3.06% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 1.09% | 2.18% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.00% | 2.11% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.19 | 15.11 |
| Daily Std Dev | 2.00% | 0.37% |
| Max Drawdown | -5.69% | -1.36% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.12% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHO and USFR is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SCHO vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SCHO achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than USFR's 2.08% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHO has underperformed USFR with an annualized return of 1.00%, while USFR has yielded a comparatively higher 2.11% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCHO vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHO has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SCHO vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) and WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SCHO vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
SCHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, less than USFR's 5.34% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 4.14% | 3.76% | 1.34% | 0.41% | 1.27% | 2.26% | 1.78% | 1.12% | 0.82% | 0.68% | 0.47% | 0.29% |
USFR WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 5.34% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SCHO vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHO drawdown since its inception was -5.69%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHO and USFR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SCHO vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) has a higher volatility of 0.60% compared to WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.09%. This indicates that SCHO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.