SCHO vs. USFR
SCHO (Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both Government Bonds funds - SCHO tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index while USFR tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHO returned 1.68%/yr vs 2.43%/yr for USFR. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCHO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.
Performance
SCHO vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHO achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than USFR's 1.78% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHO has underperformed USFR with an annualized return of 1.68%, while USFR has yielded a comparatively higher 2.43% annualized return.
SCHO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 3.09%
- 3Y*
- 4.20%
- 5Y*
- 1.84%
- 10Y*
- 1.68%
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 3.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- 2.43%
SCHO vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 0.42% | 5.49% | 3.65% | 4.31% | -3.87% | -0.64% | 3.11% | 3.47% | 1.37% | 0.33% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.78% | 4.23% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 1.98% | -0.03% | 0.56% | 2.02% | 2.01% | 1.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHO and USFR is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2014 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHO vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
SCHO
USFR
SCHO vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHO | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -12.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -46.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 13.24 | -11.80 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 200.29 | -196.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.06 | 775.73 | -760.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHO vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHO drawdown since its inception was -5.69%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHO and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHO | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.69% | -1.36% | -4.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.86% | -0.02% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.98% | -0.06% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.69% | -0.18% | -5.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.69% | -0.80% | -4.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | 0.00% | -0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.61% | -0.15% | -0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.21% | 0.01% | +0.20% |
Volatility
SCHO vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) has a higher volatility of 0.49% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.08%. This indicates that SCHO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHO | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.49% | 0.08% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.98% | 0.19% | +0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40% | 0.27% | +1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.99% | 0.40% | +1.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.56% | 0.78% | +0.78% |
SCHO vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHO vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
SCHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, which matches USFR's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 3.91% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 3.76% | 1.34% | 0.41% | 1.27% | 2.27% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 0.82% | 0.68% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.91% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHO and USFR have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHO has higher volatility (0.49%) compared to USFR (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHO dropped -5.69% vs USFR's -1.36%.
On 10-year performance, USFR leads with 2.43% vs 1.68% for SCHO. On fees, SCHO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, USFR has performed better with a 2.43% return vs 1.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for USFR.
SCHO and USFR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 3.91%.
SCHO tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHO and 0.15% for USFR.
USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.65 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHO and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer