PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHM vs. SCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHM vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHM achieves a 19.05% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's 10.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHM has underperformed SCHX with an annualized return of 11.37%, while SCHX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.41% annualized return.


SCHM

1D
-0.03%
1M
5.28%
YTD
19.05%
6M
19.54%
1Y
32.45%
3Y*
18.14%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
11.37%

SCHX

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.06%
YTD
10.72%
6M
10.60%
1Y
27.36%
3Y*
22.38%
5Y*
13.29%
10Y*
15.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHM vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
19.05%10.17%11.98%16.69%-17.07%19.36%15.26%27.48%-8.77%19.60%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
10.72%17.46%24.88%26.84%-19.41%26.81%20.81%31.22%-4.66%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHM and SCHX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2011

0.91

The correlation between SCHM and SCHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHM vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHM
SCHX

Technology

22.0%
37.5%

Industrials

21.4%
8.5%

Financial Services

11.3%
9.9%

Healthcare

10.8%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
9.7%

Real Estate

6.5%
2.0%

Basic Materials

4.7%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
4.5%

Energy

3.6%
3.4%

Utilities

3.0%
2.6%

Communication Services

2.6%
10.3%

Technology

SCHM
22.0%
SCHX
37.5%

Industrials

SCHM
21.4%
SCHX
8.5%

Financial Services

SCHM
11.3%
SCHX
9.9%

Healthcare

SCHM
10.8%
SCHX
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHM
10.3%
SCHX
9.7%

Real Estate

SCHM
6.5%
SCHX
2.0%

Basic Materials

SCHM
4.7%
SCHX
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

SCHM
3.8%
SCHX
4.5%

Energy

SCHM
3.6%
SCHX
3.4%

Utilities

SCHM
3.0%
SCHX
2.6%

Communication Services

SCHM
2.6%
SCHX
10.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHM vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHM
SCHM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SCHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHM Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHX
SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHM vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHMSCHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.41

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

3.05

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.11

13.85

+0.26

SCHM vs. SCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHM Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the SCHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHM and SCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHMSCHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

2.29

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.78

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.85

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.85

-0.26

Drawdowns

SCHM vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHM drawdown since its inception was -42.43%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHM and SCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHMSCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.43%

-34.33%

-8.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

-9.02%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.27%

-19.04%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.46%

-25.41%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.43%

-34.33%

-8.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-0.70%

+0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-3.97%

-1.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

1.98%

+0.33%

Volatility

SCHM vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) at 2.91%. This indicates that SCHM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHMSCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

2.91%

+1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.74%

9.02%

+2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.62%

11.99%

+3.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.56%

17.12%

+2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.46%

18.15%

+2.31%

SCHM vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHM vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison

SCHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than SCHX's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
1.22%1.46%1.43%1.50%1.67%1.13%1.31%1.48%1.56%1.27%1.51%1.54%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
1.01%1.09%1.22%1.39%1.64%1.22%1.64%1.82%2.02%1.70%1.92%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHM and SCHX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHM has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to SCHX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHM dropped -42.43% vs SCHX's -34.33%.

On 10-year performance, SCHX leads with 15.41% vs 11.37% for SCHM. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHX has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 15.41% return vs 11.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SCHM.

SCHM has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 1.01% for SCHX.

SCHM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while SCHX is Large Cap Blend Equities. SCHM tracks Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHM and 0.03% for SCHX.

SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHM and SCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer