PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHK vs. OEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHK vs. OEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) and iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHK achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly higher than OEF's 9.86% return.


SCHK

1D
0.50%
1M
4.73%
YTD
11.59%
6M
11.39%
1Y
28.35%
3Y*
22.57%
5Y*
13.25%
10Y*

OEF

1D
0.32%
1M
4.92%
YTD
9.86%
6M
9.63%
1Y
29.74%
3Y*
24.73%
5Y*
15.77%
10Y*
16.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHK vs. OEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHK
Schwab 1000 Index ETF
11.59%17.23%24.48%26.63%-19.51%26.17%20.75%31.31%-5.09%5.07%
OEF
iShares S&P 100 ETF
9.86%19.80%30.74%32.71%-21.03%29.18%21.21%31.87%-4.16%5.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHK and OEF is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2017

0.97

The correlation between SCHK and OEF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHK vs. OEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHK
OEF

Technology

35.1%
41.0%

Financial Services

12.0%
10.7%

Communication Services

10.3%
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.5%

Industrials

9.2%
5.3%

Healthcare

8.6%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
5.4%

Energy

3.6%
2.6%

Utilities

2.3%
0.9%

Real Estate

2.2%
0.3%

Basic Materials

2.0%
0.5%

Technology

SCHK
35.1%
OEF
41.0%

Financial Services

SCHK
12.0%
OEF
10.7%

Communication Services

SCHK
10.3%
OEF
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHK
10.1%
OEF
10.5%

Industrials

SCHK
9.2%
OEF
5.3%

Healthcare

SCHK
8.6%
OEF
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

SCHK
4.7%
OEF
5.4%

Energy

SCHK
3.6%
OEF
2.6%

Utilities

SCHK
2.3%
OEF
0.9%

Real Estate

SCHK
2.2%
OEF
0.3%

Basic Materials

SCHK
2.0%
OEF
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHK vs. OEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHK
SCHK Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SCHK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHK Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHK Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

OEF
OEF Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
OEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
OEF Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
OEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
OEF Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHK vs. OEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) and iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHKOEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.42

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

2.70

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.67

11.37

+3.30

SCHK vs. OEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHK Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the OEF Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHK and OEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHKOEFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

2.35

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.90

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.45

+0.33

Drawdowns

SCHK vs. OEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHK drawdown since its inception was -34.80%, smaller than the maximum OEF drawdown of -54.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHK and OEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHKOEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.80%

-54.11%

+19.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.97%

-11.06%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.21%

-19.80%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.44%

-26.47%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.63%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.18%

-11.76%

+6.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

2.62%

-0.68%

Volatility

SCHK vs. OEF - Volatility Comparison

Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) and iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) have volatilities of 2.94% and 3.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHKOEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

3.09%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.18%

9.48%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.16%

12.72%

-0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.23%

17.69%

-0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.11%

18.44%

+0.67%

SCHK vs. OEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than OEF's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHK vs. OEF - Dividend Comparison

SCHK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than OEF's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OEF
iShares S&P 100 ETF
0.83%0.81%1.03%1.19%1.55%1.06%1.43%1.87%2.09%1.81%2.07%2.11%
SCHK
Schwab 1000 Index ETF
1.00%1.09%1.20%1.38%1.57%1.17%1.58%1.82%1.80%0.31%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SCHK and OEF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

OEF has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to SCHK (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHK dropped -34.80% vs OEF's -54.11%.

On 5-year performance, OEF leads with 15.77% vs 13.25% for SCHK. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SCHK has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OEF has performed better with a 15.77% return vs 13.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for OEF.

SCHK has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.83% for OEF.

SCHK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OEF is Large Cap Blend Equities. SCHK tracks Schwab 1000 Index, while OEF tracks S&P 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHK and 0.20% for OEF.

OEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHK and OEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer