PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHK vs. FNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHK vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHK achieves a 11.04% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 14.57% return.


SCHK

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.06%
YTD
11.04%
6M
10.97%
1Y
27.72%
3Y*
22.29%
5Y*
13.14%
10Y*

FNDX

1D
-0.13%
1M
3.88%
YTD
14.57%
6M
14.58%
1Y
32.32%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
14.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHK vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHK
Schwab 1000 Index ETF
11.04%17.23%24.48%26.63%-19.51%26.17%20.75%31.31%-5.09%5.07%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
14.57%16.94%16.77%18.23%-6.92%31.73%9.12%28.65%-7.30%6.11%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHK and FNDX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2017

0.90

The correlation between SCHK and FNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHK vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHK
FNDX

Technology

35.1%
19.1%

Financial Services

12.0%
14.1%

Communication Services

10.3%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.2%

Industrials

9.2%
9.3%

Healthcare

8.6%
12.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
7.4%

Energy

3.6%
10.3%

Utilities

2.3%
3.2%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.8%

Basic Materials

2.0%
3.7%

Technology

SCHK
35.1%
FNDX
19.1%

Financial Services

SCHK
12.0%
FNDX
14.1%

Communication Services

SCHK
10.3%
FNDX
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHK
10.1%
FNDX
9.2%

Industrials

SCHK
9.2%
FNDX
9.3%

Healthcare

SCHK
8.6%
FNDX
12.0%

Consumer Defensive

SCHK
4.7%
FNDX
7.4%

Energy

SCHK
3.6%
FNDX
10.3%

Utilities

SCHK
2.3%
FNDX
3.2%

Real Estate

SCHK
2.2%
FNDX
1.8%

Basic Materials

SCHK
2.0%
FNDX
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHK vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHK
SCHK Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SCHK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHK Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHK Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDX
FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHK vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHKFNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.59

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

5.35

-2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.34

20.97

-6.62

SCHK vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHK Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the FNDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHK and FNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHKFNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

3.18

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.85

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.79

-0.02

Drawdowns

SCHK vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHK drawdown since its inception was -34.80%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHK and FNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHKFNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.80%

-37.72%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.97%

-6.06%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.21%

-16.30%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.44%

-19.06%

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.13%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.18%

-3.55%

-1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

1.55%

+0.39%

Volatility

SCHK vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) has a higher volatility of 2.98% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 2.25%. This indicates that SCHK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHKFNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.98%

2.25%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.17%

7.25%

+1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.16%

10.22%

+1.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.23%

15.18%

+2.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.12%

17.50%

+1.62%

SCHK vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHK vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

SCHK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than FNDX's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
1.45%1.63%1.76%1.82%2.07%1.64%2.29%2.23%2.40%1.86%2.01%2.01%
SCHK
Schwab 1000 Index ETF
1.01%1.09%1.20%1.38%1.57%1.17%1.58%1.82%1.80%0.31%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHK and FNDX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHK has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to FNDX (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHK dropped -34.80% vs FNDX's -37.72%.

On 5-year performance, SCHK leads with 13.14% vs 12.82% for FNDX. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHK has performed better with a 13.14% return vs 12.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.

FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.01% for SCHK.

SCHK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. SCHK tracks Schwab 1000 Index, while FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHK and 0.25% for FNDX.

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHK and FNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer