SCHK vs. FNDX
SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Schwab 1000 Index, while FNDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHK returned 13.14%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for FNDX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHK charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.
Performance
SCHK vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHK achieves a 11.04% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 14.57% return.
SCHK
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 11.04%
- 6M
- 10.97%
- 1Y
- 27.72%
- 3Y*
- 22.29%
- 5Y*
- 13.14%
- 10Y*
- —
FNDX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 14.57%
- 6M
- 14.58%
- 1Y
- 32.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 14.26%
SCHK vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 11.04% | 17.23% | 24.48% | 26.63% | -19.51% | 26.17% | 20.75% | 31.31% | -5.09% | 5.07% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 14.57% | 16.94% | 16.77% | 18.23% | -6.92% | 31.73% | 9.12% | 28.65% | -7.30% | 6.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHK and FNDX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2017 | 0.90 |
The correlation between SCHK and FNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHK vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHK
FNDX
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SCHK
FNDX
Financial Services
SCHK
FNDX
Communication Services
SCHK
FNDX
Consumer Cyclical
SCHK
FNDX
Industrials
SCHK
FNDX
Healthcare
SCHK
FNDX
Consumer Defensive
SCHK
FNDX
Energy
SCHK
FNDX
Utilities
SCHK
FNDX
Real Estate
SCHK
FNDX
Basic Materials
SCHK
FNDX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHK vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank
SCHK
FNDX
SCHK vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHK | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.59 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 5.35 | -2.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.34 | 20.97 | -6.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHK | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | 3.18 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.85 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.79 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
SCHK vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHK drawdown since its inception was -34.80%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHK and FNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHK | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.80% | -37.72% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.97% | -6.06% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.21% | -16.30% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.44% | -19.06% | -6.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -0.13% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.18% | -3.55% | -1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 1.55% | +0.39% |
Volatility
SCHK vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) has a higher volatility of 2.98% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 2.25%. This indicates that SCHK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHK | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 2.25% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.17% | 7.25% | +1.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.16% | 10.22% | +1.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 15.18% | +2.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.12% | 17.50% | +1.62% |
SCHK vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHK vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
SCHK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than FNDX's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.45% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.80% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHK and FNDX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHK has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to FNDX (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHK dropped -34.80% vs FNDX's -37.72%.
On 5-year performance, SCHK leads with 13.14% vs 12.82% for FNDX. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHK has performed better with a 13.14% return vs 12.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.
FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.01% for SCHK.
SCHK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. SCHK tracks Schwab 1000 Index, while FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHK and 0.25% for FNDX.
FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHK and FNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer