SCHH vs. SRET
SCHH (Schwab US REIT ETF) and SRET (Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF) are both REIT funds - SCHH tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index while SRET tracks the Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHH returned 4.02%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for SRET. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHH charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for SRET.
Performance
SCHH vs. SRET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHH achieves a 11.08% return, which is significantly higher than SRET's 3.74% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHH has outperformed SRET with an annualized return of 4.02%, while SRET has yielded a comparatively lower 1.05% annualized return.
SCHH
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- 11.08%
- 6M
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- 12.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.95%
- 10Y*
- 4.02%
SRET
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -1.81%
- YTD
- 3.74%
- 6M
- 4.08%
- 1Y
- 14.94%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- 1.19%
- 10Y*
- 1.05%
SCHH vs. SRET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 11.08% | 2.20% | 4.99% | 11.18% | -24.99% | 41.07% | -14.81% | 22.85% | -4.26% | 3.68% |
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | 3.74% | 18.09% | -1.55% | 9.85% | -18.24% | 14.00% | -36.63% | 22.77% | -5.52% | 17.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHH and SRET is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2015 | 0.74 |
The correlation between SCHH and SRET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHH vs. SRET - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHH
SRET
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
SCHH
SRET
Basic Materials
SCHH
SRET
-
Financial Services
SCHH
SRET
Communication Services
SCHH
-
SRET
-
Consumer Cyclical
SCHH
-
SRET
-
Consumer Defensive
SCHH
-
SRET
-
Energy
SCHH
-
SRET
-
Healthcare
SCHH
-
SRET
-
Industrials
SCHH
-
SRET
-
Technology
SCHH
-
SRET
-
Utilities
SCHH
-
SRET
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHH vs. SRET — Risk / Return Rank
SCHH
SRET
SCHH vs. SRET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHH | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 1.32 | -0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 1.84 | -0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.23 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 1.58 | -0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.62 | 6.61 | -1.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHH | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 1.32 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.07 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.04 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.06 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
SCHH vs. SRET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHH drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, smaller than the maximum SRET drawdown of -66.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHH and SRET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHH | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.22% | -66.98% | +22.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.28% | -9.48% | +1.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.76% | -18.87% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.28% | -30.56% | -2.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.22% | -66.98% | +22.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.19% | -24.23% | +21.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.45% | -22.49% | +13.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 2.27% | +0.35% |
Volatility
SCHH vs. SRET - Volatility Comparison
Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) at 3.11%. This indicates that SCHH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHH | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 3.11% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 8.72% | +0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.17% | 11.36% | +1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 16.50% | +2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.97% | 24.58% | -3.61% |
SCHH vs. SRET - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHH has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SRET's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHH vs. SRET - Dividend Comparison
SCHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, less than SRET's 8.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 2.82% | 3.04% | 3.22% | 3.24% | 2.55% | 1.50% | 2.86% | 2.86% | 3.64% | 2.22% | 2.81% | 2.48% |
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | 8.78% | 7.98% | 8.72% | 7.21% | 8.30% | 6.33% | 8.88% | 7.83% | 8.54% | 8.20% | 8.08% | 7.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHH and SRET have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHH has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to SRET (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHH dropped -44.22% vs SRET's -66.98%.
On 10-year performance, SCHH leads with 4.02% vs 1.05% for SRET. On fees, SCHH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SRET has been the lower-risk option at 3.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHH has performed better with a 4.02% return vs 1.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SRET.
SRET has the higher dividend yield at 8.78%, compared with 2.82% for SCHH.
SCHH tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index, while SRET tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SCHH and 0.58% for SRET.
SRET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHH and SRET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer