SCHG vs. FSPGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX).
SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. FSPGX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
SCHG vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SCHG vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -10.59% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 27.05% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.03% | 18.54% | 33.27% | 42.77% | -29.17% | 27.57% | 38.46% | 36.38% | -1.79% | 27.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a -10.59% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's -13.03% return.
SCHG
- 1D
- 3.67%
- 1M
- -5.12%
- YTD
- -10.59%
- 6M
- -8.51%
- 1Y
- 16.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.91%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 16.83%
FSPGX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.03%
- 6M
- -12.06%
- 1Y
- 14.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.91%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCHG vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
SCHG vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank
SCHG
FSPGX
SCHG vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHG | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.75 | 0.66 | +0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.23 | 1.10 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.15 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 0.72 | +0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.54 | 2.51 | +1.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHG | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 0.66 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.56 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.78 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHG and FSPGX is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SCHG vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison
SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, more than FSPGX's 0.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.40% | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.73% | 0.86% | 2.22% | 1.76% | 1.04% | 1.32% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SCHG vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and FSPGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHG | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.59% | -32.66% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.41% | -16.17% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.59% | -32.66% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.34% | -16.17% | +2.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -6.43% | +1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.78% | 4.63% | +0.15% |
Volatility
SCHG vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) at 5.33%. This indicates that SCHG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SCHG | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.67% | 5.33% | +1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.51% | 11.79% | +0.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.43% | 22.32% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.32% | 21.46% | +0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.51% | 21.63% | -0.12% |