SCHC vs. KWEB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCHC (Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF) and KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHC is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux), while KWEB is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI Overseas China Internet Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHC returned 8.02%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for KWEB. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHC charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for KWEB.

Performance

SCHC vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHC achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly higher than KWEB's -20.06% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHC has outperformed KWEB with an annualized return of 8.02%, while KWEB has yielded a comparatively lower 0.02% annualized return.

SCHC

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 9.49%
• 6M: 12.08%
• 1Y: 27.44%
• 3Y*: 17.96%
• 5Y*: 6.18%
• 10Y*: 8.02%

KWEB

• 1D: -3.92%
• 1M: -4.79%
• YTD: -20.06%
• 6M: -22.24%
• 1Y: -12.78%
• 3Y*: 4.05%
• 5Y*: -14.28%
• 10Y*: 0.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHC vs. KWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF	9.49%	37.59%	1.97%	14.36%	-21.74%	12.02%	10.48%	23.10%	-18.60%	29.42%
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	-20.06%	23.55%	12.01%	-9.06%	-17.24%	-49.01%	58.23%	29.92%	-33.80%	69.73%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHC and KWEB is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2013	0.52

The correlation between SCHC and KWEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHC vs. KWEB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHC	KWEB
Industrials	22.4%	3.1%
Basic Materials	13.7%	-
Financial Services	12.6%	2.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	37.7%
Technology	9.2%	17.6%
Real Estate	8.6%	5.2%
Energy	6.5%	-
Healthcare	6.5%	6.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	3.1%
Communication Services	3.2%	24.8%
Utilities	3.2%	-

Return for Risk

SCHC vs. KWEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHC

SCHC Risk / Return Rank: 49
SCHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
SCHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
SCHC Omega Ratio Rank: 50
SCHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
SCHC Martin Ratio Rank: 49

KWEB

KWEB Risk / Return Rank: 5
KWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
KWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
KWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 5
KWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
KWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHC vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHC	KWEB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	-0.47	+2.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	-0.52	+2.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	0.94	+0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	-0.38	+2.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.41	-0.76	+9.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHC vs. KWEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHC Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the KWEB Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHC and KWEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHC	KWEB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.78	-0.47	+2.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	-0.30	+0.66
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	0.00	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.06	+0.34

Drawdowns

SCHC vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHC drawdown since its inception was -43.94%, smaller than the maximum KWEB drawdown of -80.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHC and KWEB.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHC	KWEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.94%	-80.92%	+36.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.48%	-34.13%	+21.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.52%	-34.13%	+18.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.48%	-72.17%	+35.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.94%	-80.92%	+36.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.28%	-68.52%	+65.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.05%	-35.24%	+25.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.27%	16.85%	-13.58%

Volatility

SCHC vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) is 5.05%, while KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) has a volatility of 11.52%. This indicates that SCHC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHC	KWEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.05%	11.52%	-6.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.05%	20.11%	-7.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.50%	27.25%	-11.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.50%	47.67%	-30.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.99%	39.99%	-22.00%

SCHC vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHC has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than KWEB's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCHC vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison

SCHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, less than KWEB's 7.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	7.70%	6.16%	3.51%	1.71%	0.00%	7.07%	0.29%	0.08%	3.40%	0.58%	1.19%	0.46%
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF	3.34%	3.66%	3.72%	2.94%	1.78%	3.02%	1.62%	3.23%	2.51%	2.73%	2.01%	2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHC and KWEB in my portfolio?

SCHC and KWEB have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHC or KWEB?

KWEB has higher volatility (11.52%) compared to SCHC (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHC dropped -43.94% vs KWEB's -80.92%.

Which ETF is better, SCHC or KWEB?

On 10-year performance, SCHC leads with 8.02% vs 0.02% for KWEB. On fees, SCHC is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, SCHC has been the lower-risk option at 5.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHC or KWEB?

Over the 10-year period, SCHC has performed better with a 8.02% return vs 0.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHC or KWEB?

SCHC is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for KWEB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHC or KWEB?

KWEB has the higher dividend yield at 7.70%, compared with 3.34% for SCHC.

What is the main difference between SCHC and KWEB?

SCHC is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while KWEB is China Equities. SCHC tracks FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux), while KWEB tracks CSI Overseas China Internet Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for SCHC and 0.70% for KWEB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.