PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHA vs. CALF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHA vs. CALF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHA achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly higher than CALF's 13.34% return.


SCHA

1D
-0.58%
1M
4.77%
YTD
19.79%
6M
19.32%
1Y
40.27%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
11.13%

CALF

1D
-1.12%
1M
4.91%
YTD
13.34%
6M
12.53%
1Y
30.24%
3Y*
10.69%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHA vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
19.79%11.60%11.16%18.46%-19.81%16.45%19.34%26.50%-11.79%9.59%
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
13.34%2.33%-7.41%35.43%-15.20%40.68%16.55%18.18%-10.06%5.78%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHA and CALF is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2017

0.87

The correlation between SCHA and CALF shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHA vs. CALF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHA
CALF

Technology

23.3%
29.7%

Financial Services

15.7%
0.2%

Industrials

15.4%
5.9%

Healthcare

13.5%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
28.3%

Real Estate

6.0%
1.6%

Energy

5.5%
10.3%

Basic Materials

4.2%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
4.3%

Communication Services

2.4%
8.8%

Utilities

2.3%

-

Technology

SCHA
23.3%
CALF
29.7%

Financial Services

SCHA
15.7%
CALF
0.2%

Industrials

SCHA
15.4%
CALF
5.9%

Healthcare

SCHA
13.5%
CALF
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHA
9.0%
CALF
28.3%

Real Estate

SCHA
6.0%
CALF
1.6%

Energy

SCHA
5.5%
CALF
10.3%

Basic Materials

SCHA
4.2%
CALF
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

SCHA
2.6%
CALF
4.3%

Communication Services

SCHA
2.4%
CALF
8.8%

Utilities

SCHA
2.3%
CALF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHA vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHA
SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

CALF
CALF Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CALF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALF Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CALF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALF Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHA vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHACALFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.25

1.93

+0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.16

2.82

+0.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.34

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.26

4.94

-0.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.66

14.08

+1.58

SCHA vs. CALF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHA Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the CALF Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHA and CALF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHACALFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

1.93

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.18

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.37

+0.20

Drawdowns

SCHA vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHA drawdown since its inception was -42.41%, smaller than the maximum CALF drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHA and CALF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHACALFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.41%

-47.58%

+5.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

-6.15%

-3.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.29%

-34.22%

+6.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.79%

-34.22%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-1.95%

+1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.58%

-10.74%

+3.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

2.15%

+0.43%

Volatility

SCHA vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) have volatilities of 5.08% and 4.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHACALFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

4.92%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.83%

10.47%

+2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.01%

15.84%

+2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.93%

23.44%

-1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.71%

26.02%

-3.31%

SCHA vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHA has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHA vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison

SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than CALF's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.28%1.43%1.07%1.18%0.85%2.63%0.82%0.99%1.39%0.70%0.00%0.00%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
1.00%1.26%1.51%1.42%1.37%1.19%1.05%1.39%1.58%1.24%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHA and CALF have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHA has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to CALF (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHA dropped -42.41% vs CALF's -47.58%.

On 5-year performance, SCHA leads with 7.13% vs 4.12% for CALF. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, CALF has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHA has performed better with a 7.13% return vs 4.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.

CALF has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.00% for SCHA.

SCHA is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while CALF is Small Cap Blend Equities. SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index, while CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHA and 0.59% for CALF.

SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHA and CALF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer