SCHA vs. CALF
SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) and CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHA is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index, while CALF is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHA returned 7.13%/yr vs 4.12%/yr for CALF. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHA charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for CALF.
Performance
SCHA vs. CALF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHA achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly higher than CALF's 13.34% return.
SCHA
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 6M
- 19.32%
- 1Y
- 40.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.92%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 11.13%
CALF
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 13.34%
- 6M
- 12.53%
- 1Y
- 30.24%
- 3Y*
- 10.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHA vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 19.79% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | -19.81% | 16.45% | 19.34% | 26.50% | -11.79% | 9.59% |
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 13.34% | 2.33% | -7.41% | 35.43% | -15.20% | 40.68% | 16.55% | 18.18% | -10.06% | 5.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHA and CALF is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2017 | 0.87 |
The correlation between SCHA and CALF shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHA vs. CALF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHA
CALF
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Technology
SCHA
CALF
Financial Services
SCHA
CALF
Industrials
SCHA
CALF
Healthcare
SCHA
CALF
Consumer Cyclical
SCHA
CALF
Real Estate
SCHA
CALF
Energy
SCHA
CALF
Basic Materials
SCHA
CALF
Consumer Defensive
SCHA
CALF
Communication Services
SCHA
CALF
Utilities
SCHA
CALF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHA vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank
SCHA
CALF
SCHA vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHA | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.25 | 1.93 | +0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.16 | 2.82 | +0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.34 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.26 | 4.94 | -0.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.66 | 14.08 | +1.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHA | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 1.93 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.18 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.37 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
SCHA vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHA drawdown since its inception was -42.41%, smaller than the maximum CALF drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHA and CALF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHA | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.41% | -47.58% | +5.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.50% | -6.15% | -3.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.29% | -34.22% | +6.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | -34.22% | +3.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -1.95% | +1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.58% | -10.74% | +3.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 2.15% | +0.43% |
Volatility
SCHA vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) have volatilities of 5.08% and 4.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHA | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 4.92% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.83% | 10.47% | +2.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.01% | 15.84% | +2.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.93% | 23.44% | -1.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.71% | 26.02% | -3.31% |
SCHA vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHA has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHA vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison
SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than CALF's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 2.63% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 1.39% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1.00% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHA and CALF have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHA has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to CALF (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHA dropped -42.41% vs CALF's -47.58%.
On 5-year performance, SCHA leads with 7.13% vs 4.12% for CALF. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, CALF has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHA has performed better with a 7.13% return vs 4.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.
CALF has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.00% for SCHA.
SCHA is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while CALF is Small Cap Blend Equities. SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index, while CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHA and 0.59% for CALF.
SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHA and CALF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer