PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCGRX vs. FSKAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCGRX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Multi-Asset Moderate Growth Fund (SCGRX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCGRX achieves a 9.36% return, which is significantly lower than FSKAX's 12.08% return. Over the past 10 years, SCGRX has underperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 9.03%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.09% annualized return.


SCGRX

1D
0.42%
1M
4.47%
YTD
9.36%
6M
10.35%
1Y
21.97%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
8.21%
10Y*
9.03%

FSKAX

1D
0.24%
1M
5.80%
YTD
12.08%
6M
11.98%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
13.08%
10Y*
15.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCGRX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCGRX
Franklin Multi-Asset Moderate Growth Fund
9.36%15.00%14.61%15.83%-13.52%13.96%8.70%19.40%-7.14%13.69%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
12.08%17.06%23.89%26.12%-19.53%25.66%20.79%30.92%-5.32%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SCGRX and FSKAX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.96

The correlation between SCGRX and FSKAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCGRX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCGRX
SCGRX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SCGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SCGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FSKAX
FSKAX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FSKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FSKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCGRX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Multi-Asset Moderate Growth Fund (SCGRX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCGRXFSKAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.26

2.46

-0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.16

3.35

-0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.44

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

3.38

-0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.21

15.52

-2.32

SCGRX vs. FSKAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCGRX and FSKAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCGRXFSKAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

2.46

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.76

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.82

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.85

-0.39

Drawdowns

SCGRX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCGRX drawdown since its inception was -47.11%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCGRX and FSKAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCGRXFSKAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.11%

-35.01%

-12.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-8.92%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.22%

-19.43%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.53%

-25.39%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.89%

-35.01%

+7.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-4.02%

-3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.94%

-0.25%

Volatility

SCGRX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Multi-Asset Moderate Growth Fund (SCGRX) is 2.74%, while Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that SCGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCGRXFSKAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

2.97%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.84%

9.23%

-1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.95%

12.26%

-2.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.72%

17.41%

-4.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.71%

18.46%

-5.75%

SCGRX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCGRX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCGRX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

SCGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.58%, more than FSKAX's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
0.93%1.01%1.19%1.41%1.62%1.15%1.45%1.94%2.54%2.07%2.43%0.82%
SCGRX
Franklin Multi-Asset Moderate Growth Fund
9.58%10.47%6.15%4.42%8.00%7.39%5.31%5.72%6.43%9.72%4.57%9.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, SCGRX and FSKAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSKAX has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to SCGRX (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCGRX dropped -47.11% vs FSKAX's -35.01%.

FSKAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCGRX and FSKAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer