SCGRX vs. BIAPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCGRX (Franklin Multi-Asset Moderate Growth Fund) and BIAPX (BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, SCGRX returned 9.04%/yr vs 10.63%/yr for BIAPX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCGRX charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BIAPX.

Performance

SCGRX vs. BIAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Multi-Asset Moderate Growth Fund (SCGRX) and BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund (BIAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCGRX achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly lower than BIAPX's 12.78% return. Over the past 10 years, SCGRX has underperformed BIAPX with an annualized return of 9.04%, while BIAPX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.63% annualized return.

SCGRX

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 4.99%
• YTD: 9.54%
• 6M: 10.16%
• 1Y: 21.81%
• 3Y*: 16.17%
• 5Y*: 8.30%
• 10Y*: 9.04%

BIAPX

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 6.22%
• YTD: 12.78%
• 6M: 13.30%
• 1Y: 27.61%
• 3Y*: 15.39%
• 5Y*: 8.16%
• 10Y*: 10.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCGRX vs. BIAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCGRX Franklin Multi-Asset Moderate Growth Fund	9.54%	15.00%	14.61%	15.83%	-13.52%	13.96%	8.70%	19.40%	-7.14%	13.69%
BIAPX BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund	12.78%	18.33%	5.46%	19.20%	-16.15%	14.95%	19.50%	24.72%	-7.62%	17.47%

Correlation

The correlation between SCGRX and BIAPX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2006	0.95

The correlation between SCGRX and BIAPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SCGRX vs. BIAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCGRX

SCGRX Risk / Return Rank: 59
SCGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
SCGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SCGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
SCGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
SCGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

BIAPX

BIAPX Risk / Return Rank: 75
BIAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
BIAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
BIAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
BIAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
BIAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCGRX vs. BIAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Multi-Asset Moderate Growth Fund (SCGRX) and BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund (BIAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCGRX	BIAPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	2.55	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	3.60	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.47	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.93	3.27	-0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.14	15.06	-1.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCGRX vs. BIAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the BIAPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCGRX and BIAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCGRX	BIAPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	2.55	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.57	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	0.76	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.45	+0.01

Drawdowns

SCGRX vs. BIAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCGRX drawdown since its inception was -47.11%, smaller than the maximum BIAPX drawdown of -53.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCGRX and BIAPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCGRX	BIAPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.11%	-53.40%	+6.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.59%	-8.64%	+1.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.22%	-20.90%	+6.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.53%	-23.29%	-1.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.89%	-27.13%	-0.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.87%	-7.99%	+0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.69%	1.87%	-0.18%

Volatility

SCGRX vs. BIAPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Multi-Asset Moderate Growth Fund (SCGRX) is 2.74%, while BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund (BIAPX) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that SCGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCGRX	BIAPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.74%	3.70%	-0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.83%	9.31%	-1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.93%	11.08%	-1.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.72%	14.53%	-1.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.71%	14.04%	-1.33%

SCGRX vs. BIAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCGRX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than BIAPX's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCGRX vs. BIAPX - Dividend Comparison

SCGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.56%, more than BIAPX's 5.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIAPX BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund	5.30%	5.98%	0.00%	4.28%	2.30%	6.04%	2.07%	2.49%	6.26%	3.12%	1.67%	13.86%
SCGRX Franklin Multi-Asset Moderate Growth Fund	9.56%	10.47%	6.15%	4.42%	8.00%	7.39%	5.31%	5.72%	6.43%	9.72%	4.57%	9.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCGRX and BIAPX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, SCGRX and BIAPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SCGRX or BIAPX?

BIAPX has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to SCGRX (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCGRX dropped -47.11% vs BIAPX's -53.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.