SC0J.DE vs. XLKQ.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF Acc (SC0J.DE) and Invesco US Technology Sector UCITS ETF (XLKQ.L).
SC0J.DE and XLKQ.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SC0J.DE is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World. It was launched on Apr 2, 2009. XLKQ.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. Both SC0J.DE and XLKQ.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SC0J.DE or XLKQ.L.
Correlation
The correlation between SC0J.DE and XLKQ.L is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SC0J.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SC0J.DE:
2.17
XLKQ.L:
1.35
SC0J.DE:
2.96
XLKQ.L:
1.81
SC0J.DE:
1.43
XLKQ.L:
1.25
SC0J.DE:
3.07
XLKQ.L:
1.99
SC0J.DE:
14.44
XLKQ.L:
5.82
SC0J.DE:
1.72%
XLKQ.L:
4.91%
SC0J.DE:
11.51%
XLKQ.L:
21.58%
SC0J.DE:
-33.91%
XLKQ.L:
-23.83%
SC0J.DE:
-0.29%
XLKQ.L:
-3.34%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SC0J.DE achieves a 4.42% return, which is significantly higher than XLKQ.L's -0.14% return. Over the past 10 years, SC0J.DE has underperformed XLKQ.L with an annualized return of 11.57%, while XLKQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 23.99% annualized return.
SC0J.DE
4.42%
1.80%
14.76%
25.20%
12.71%
11.57%
XLKQ.L
-0.14%
-0.55%
12.38%
34.67%
23.95%
23.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SC0J.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SC0J.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SC0J.DE vs. XLKQ.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SC0J.DE
XLKQ.L
SC0J.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF Acc (SC0J.DE) and Invesco US Technology Sector UCITS ETF (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SC0J.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SC0J.DE nor XLKQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SC0J.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SC0J.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.91%, which is greater than XLKQ.L's maximum drawdown of -23.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC0J.DE and XLKQ.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SC0J.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF Acc (SC0J.DE) is 2.73%, while Invesco US Technology Sector UCITS ETF (XLKQ.L) has a volatility of 8.68%. This indicates that SC0J.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.