SC0J.DE vs. XDWD.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF Acc (SC0J.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE).
SC0J.DE and XDWD.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SC0J.DE is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World. It was launched on Apr 2, 2009. XDWD.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World. It was launched on Jul 22, 2014. Both SC0J.DE and XDWD.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SC0J.DE or XDWD.DE.
Correlation
The correlation between SC0J.DE and XDWD.DE is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SC0J.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SC0J.DE:
2.17
XDWD.DE:
2.14
SC0J.DE:
2.96
XDWD.DE:
2.93
SC0J.DE:
1.43
XDWD.DE:
1.43
SC0J.DE:
3.07
XDWD.DE:
3.03
SC0J.DE:
14.44
XDWD.DE:
14.15
SC0J.DE:
1.72%
XDWD.DE:
1.75%
SC0J.DE:
11.51%
XDWD.DE:
11.58%
SC0J.DE:
-33.91%
XDWD.DE:
-33.55%
SC0J.DE:
-0.29%
XDWD.DE:
-0.23%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SC0J.DE having a 4.42% return and XDWD.DE slightly higher at 4.50%. Over the past 10 years, SC0J.DE has outperformed XDWD.DE with an annualized return of 11.57%, while XDWD.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.97% annualized return.
SC0J.DE
4.42%
0.95%
14.76%
23.11%
12.71%
11.57%
XDWD.DE
4.50%
0.99%
14.76%
22.98%
12.65%
10.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SC0J.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SC0J.DE and XDWD.DE have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SC0J.DE vs. XDWD.DE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SC0J.DE
XDWD.DE
SC0J.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF Acc (SC0J.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SC0J.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SC0J.DE nor XDWD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SC0J.DE Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XDWD.DE Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.04% |
Drawdowns
SC0J.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SC0J.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.91%, roughly equal to the maximum XDWD.DE drawdown of -33.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC0J.DE and XDWD.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SC0J.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF Acc (SC0J.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE) have volatilities of 3.24% and 3.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.