SC0H.DE vs. IVV
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (SC0H.DE) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV).
SC0H.DE and IVV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SC0H.DE is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA. It was launched on Mar 31, 2009. IVV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 15, 2000. Both SC0H.DE and IVV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SC0H.DE or IVV.
Key characteristics
| SC0H.DE | IVV | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 30.42% | 27.13% |
| 1Y Return | 38.75% | 39.88% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 12.11% | 10.28% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 16.40% | 16.00% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 16.10% | 13.42% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.06 | 3.15 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.15 | 4.20 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.63 | 1.59 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.38 | 4.62 |
| Martin Ratio | 19.73 | 20.91 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.87% | 1.86% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.99% | 12.31% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.20% | -55.25% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SC0H.DE and IVV is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SC0H.DE vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SC0H.DE achieves a 30.42% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 27.13% return. Over the past 10 years, SC0H.DE has outperformed IVV with an annualized return of 16.10%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively lower 13.42% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SC0H.DE vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SC0H.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SC0H.DE vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (SC0H.DE) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SC0H.DE vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
SC0H.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SC0H.DE Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.24% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.99% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% | 1.83% | 1.80% |
Drawdowns
SC0H.DE vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SC0H.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.20%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC0H.DE and IVV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SC0H.DE vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (SC0H.DE) is 3.49%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 3.95%. This indicates that SC0H.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.