SBSW vs. VFC
SBSW (Sibanye Stillwater Limited) and VFC (V.F. Corporation) are both stocks. SBSW operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while VFC operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, SBSW returned 2.23%/yr vs -9.28%/yr for VFC. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SBSW vs. VFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBSW achieves a -19.34% return, which is significantly lower than VFC's -8.21% return. Over the past 10 years, SBSW has outperformed VFC with an annualized return of 2.23%, while VFC has yielded a comparatively lower -9.28% annualized return.
SBSW
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- -19.34%
- 6M
- -6.93%
- 1Y
- 90.62%
- 3Y*
- 16.92%
- 5Y*
- -7.16%
- 10Y*
- 2.23%
VFC
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -9.88%
- YTD
- -8.21%
- 6M
- -10.18%
- 1Y
- 34.62%
- 3Y*
- 0.12%
- 5Y*
- -24.40%
- 10Y*
- -9.28%
SBSW vs. VFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBSW Sibanye Stillwater Limited | -19.34% | 331.82% | -39.23% | -46.54% | -9.57% | -12.44% | 61.55% | 250.88% | -41.72% | -26.00% |
VFC V.F. Corporation | -8.21% | -13.83% | 16.64% | -28.51% | -60.38% | -12.05% | -12.00% | 51.70% | -1.33% | 42.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBSW and VFC is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2013 | 0.13 |
Fundamentals
SBSW:
-$17.51
VFC:
$0.57
SBSW:
0.03
VFC:
0.68
SBSW:
$238.26B
VFC:
$9.58B
SBSW:
$50.42B
VFC:
$5.16B
SBSW:
$23.43B
VFC:
$961.05M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBSW vs. VFC — Risk / Return Rank
SBSW
VFC
SBSW vs. VFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) and V.F. Corporation (VFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBSW | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.16 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 1.36 | +0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.09 | 3.20 | +0.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBSW | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 0.71 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | -0.46 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 | -0.21 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.23 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
SBSW vs. VFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBSW drawdown since its inception was -89.24%, roughly equal to the maximum VFC drawdown of -88.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBSW and VFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBSW | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.24% | -88.41% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.92% | -25.57% | -20.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.18% | -63.66% | +5.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.53% | -86.78% | +4.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.24% | -88.41% | -0.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.58% | -79.89% | +34.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.22% | -21.63% | -26.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.24% | 10.86% | +11.38% |
Volatility
SBSW vs. VFC - Volatility Comparison
Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) has a higher volatility of 21.30% compared to V.F. Corporation (VFC) at 13.20%. This indicates that SBSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBSW | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.30% | 13.20% | +8.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.12% | 31.26% | +18.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.93% | 48.75% | +18.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.63% | 53.49% | +6.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.06% | 44.88% | +19.18% |
Dividends
SBSW vs. VFC - Dividend Comparison
SBSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, more than VFC's 2.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBSW Sibanye Stillwater Limited | 2.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.98% | 7.68% | 13.34% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.68% | 5.12% | 3.05% |
VFC V.F. Corporation | 2.18% | 1.99% | 1.68% | 5.27% | 7.28% | 2.69% | 2.26% | 1.91% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 2.87% | 2.14% |
Financials
SBSW vs. VFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sibanye Stillwater Limited and V.F. Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SBSW vs. VFC - Profitability Comparison
SBSW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sibanye Stillwater Limited reported a gross profit of 18.20B and revenue of 71.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.5%.
VFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, V.F. Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.60B and revenue of 2.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.6%.
SBSW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sibanye Stillwater Limited reported an operating income of 13.77B and revenue of 71.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.3%.
VFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, V.F. Corporation reported an operating income of 289.05M and revenue of 2.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.
SBSW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sibanye Stillwater Limited reported a net income of -1.51B and revenue of 71.36B, resulting in a net margin of -2.1%.
VFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, V.F. Corporation reported a net income of 300.85M and revenue of 2.88B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SBSW and VFC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SBSW has higher volatility (21.30%) compared to VFC (13.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBSW dropped -89.24% vs VFC's -88.41%.
SBSW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SBSW and VFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer