SBR vs. PFLT
Compare and contrast key facts about Sabine Royalty Trust (SBR) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SBR or PFLT.
Key characteristics
| SBR | PFLT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -2.62% | -2.68% |
| 1Y Return | -0.09% | 15.60% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 32.97% | 7.26% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 15.41% | 9.73% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 10.11% | 7.75% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.01 | 1.06 |
| Daily Std Dev | 28.62% | 15.47% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.41% | -69.77% |
| Current Drawdown | -19.93% | -6.61% |
Fundamentals
| SBR | PFLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $927.39M | $768.04M |
| EPS | $6.19 | $1.54 |
| PE Ratio | 10.28 | 7.47 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | 0.27 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $87.34M | $155.77M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $125.98M | $139.34M |
Correlation
The correlation between SBR and PFLT is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SBR vs. PFLT - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SBR having a -2.62% return and PFLT slightly lower at -2.68%. Over the past 10 years, SBR has outperformed PFLT with an annualized return of 10.11%, while PFLT has yielded a comparatively lower 7.75% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SBR vs. PFLT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sabine Royalty Trust (SBR) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SBR vs. PFLT - Dividend Comparison
SBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.19%, less than PFLT's 10.92% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBR Sabine Royalty Trust | 9.19% | 9.41% | 10.13% | 7.72% | 8.59% | 7.49% | 8.98% | 5.31% | 5.49% | 11.82% | 11.45% | 7.75% |
PFLT PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. | 10.92% | 9.98% | 10.38% | 8.93% | 10.83% | 9.36% | 9.85% | 8.31% | 8.08% | 10.04% | 7.87% | 7.63% |
Drawdowns
SBR vs. PFLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBR drawdown since its inception was -56.41%, smaller than the maximum PFLT drawdown of -69.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBR and PFLT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SBR vs. PFLT - Volatility Comparison
Sabine Royalty Trust (SBR) has a higher volatility of 7.85% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) at 3.59%. This indicates that SBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
SBR vs. PFLT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sabine Royalty Trust and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities