SBOW vs. SI=F
Compare and contrast key facts about SilverBow Resources, Inc. (SBOW) and Silver (SI=F).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SBOW or SI=F.
Key characteristics
| SBOW | SI=F |
|---|
Correlation
The correlation between SBOW and SI=F is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SBOW vs. SI=F - Performance Comparison
The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SBOW vs. SI=F - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SilverBow Resources, Inc. (SBOW) and Silver (SI=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Drawdowns
SBOW vs. SI=F - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
SBOW vs. SI=F - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SilverBow Resources, Inc. (SBOW) is 0.00%, while Silver (SI=F) has a volatility of 8.76%. This indicates that SBOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SI=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.