SBLK vs. YYY

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) and Amplify CEF High Income ETF (YYY).

YYY is a passively managed fund by Amplify that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq CEF High Income™ Index. It was launched on Jun 12, 2012.

Performance

SBLK vs. YYY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) and Amplify CEF High Income ETF (YYY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SBLK vs. YYY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SBLK Star Bulk Carriers Corp.	25.00%	30.76%	-21.04%	19.24%	8.50%	185.15%	-24.77%	29.82%	-18.83%	120.35%
YYY Amplify CEF High Income ETF	-0.92%	13.08%	11.86%	12.98%	-21.78%	14.13%	-0.86%	21.87%	-10.21%	13.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBLK achieves a 25.00% return, which is significantly higher than YYY's -0.92% return. Over the past 10 years, SBLK has outperformed YYY with an annualized return of 27.31%, while YYY has yielded a comparatively lower 5.60% annualized return.

SBLK

• 1D: 2.96%
• 1M: -10.65%
• YTD: 25.00%
• 6M: 29.03%
• 1Y: 54.54%
• 3Y*: 10.98%
• 5Y*: 23.74%
• 10Y*: 27.31%

YYY

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -4.58%
• YTD: -0.92%
• 6M: -0.83%
• 1Y: 9.89%
• 3Y*: 11.15%
• 5Y*: 3.21%
• 10Y*: 5.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SBLK vs. YYY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBLK

SBLK Risk / Return Rank: 82
SBLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
SBLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
SBLK Omega Ratio Rank: 78
SBLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
SBLK Martin Ratio Rank: 85

YYY

YYY Risk / Return Rank: 39
YYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
YYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
YYY Omega Ratio Rank: 45
YYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
YYY Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBLK vs. YYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) and Amplify CEF High Income ETF (YYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SBLK	YYY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	0.76	+0.81
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	1.05	+1.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.18	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	0.91	+1.98
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.24	4.18	+4.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SBLK vs. YYY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBLK Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the YYY Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBLK and YYY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SBLK	YYY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	0.76	+0.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	0.28	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	0.40	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.20	0.40	-0.60

Correlation

The correlation between SBLK and YYY is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SBLK vs. YYY - Dividend Comparison

SBLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than YYY's 13.03% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SBLK Star Bulk Carriers Corp.	2.45%	1.56%	16.72%	7.38%	33.80%	9.93%	0.57%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
YYY Amplify CEF High Income ETF	13.03%	12.51%	12.50%	12.39%	12.36%	9.08%	9.79%	9.10%	9.73%	8.16%	10.34%	10.77%

Drawdowns

SBLK vs. YYY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBLK drawdown since its inception was -99.76%, which is greater than YYY's maximum drawdown of -42.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBLK and YYY.

Drawdown Indicators

	SBLK	YYY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.76%	-42.52%	-57.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.11%	-10.70%	-8.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.44%	-27.92%	-20.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.77%	-42.52%	-31.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.36%	-5.07%	-89.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-82.59%	-6.91%	-75.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.81%	2.32%	+4.49%

Volatility

SBLK vs. YYY - Volatility Comparison

Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) has a higher volatility of 11.72% compared to Amplify CEF High Income ETF (YYY) at 5.18%. This indicates that SBLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SBLK	YYY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.72%	5.18%	+6.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.65%	7.16%	+15.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.90%	13.10%	+21.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.05%	11.33%	+33.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.71%	13.89%	+39.82%