SBH vs. ULTA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. (SBH) and Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA).

Performance

SBH vs. ULTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. (SBH) and Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SBH vs. ULTA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SBH Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.	-0.70%	36.46%	-21.31%	6.07%	-32.18%	41.56%	-28.55%	7.04%	-9.12%	-28.99%
ULTA Ulta Beauty, Inc.	-11.31%	39.11%	-11.24%	4.46%	13.76%	43.59%	13.44%	3.39%	9.47%	-12.27%

Fundamentals

Market Cap SBH : $1.43B ULTA : $23.89B
EPS SBH : $1.77 ULTA : $25.63
PE Ratio SBH : 8.00 ULTA : 20.94
PS Ratio SBH : 0.39 ULTA : 1.95
PB Ratio SBH : 1.73 ULTA : 8.52
Total Revenue (TTM) SBH : $3.71B ULTA : $12.39B
Gross Profit (TTM) SBH : $1.92B ULTA : $4.85B
EBITDA (TTM) SBH : $380.26M ULTA : $1.76B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBH achieves a -0.70% return, which is significantly higher than ULTA's -11.31% return. Over the past 10 years, SBH has underperformed ULTA with an annualized return of -8.02%, while ULTA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.70% annualized return.

SBH

• 1D: 2.24%
• 1M: -12.59%
• YTD: -0.70%
• 6M: -13.13%
• 1Y: 58.74%
• 3Y*: -3.14%
• 5Y*: -6.84%
• 10Y*: -8.02%

ULTA

• 1D: 2.66%
• 1M: -20.74%
• YTD: -11.31%
• 6M: -3.49%
• 1Y: 43.51%
• 3Y*: -0.56%
• 5Y*: 11.34%
• 10Y*: 10.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SBH vs. ULTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBH

SBH Risk / Return Rank: 77
SBH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
SBH Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
SBH Omega Ratio Rank: 71
SBH Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
SBH Martin Ratio Rank: 80

ULTA

ULTA Risk / Return Rank: 76
ULTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
ULTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
ULTA Omega Ratio Rank: 75
ULTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
ULTA Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBH vs. ULTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. (SBH) and Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SBH	ULTA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	1.18	-0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	1.83	+0.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.25	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	1.67	+0.94
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.13	6.26	-0.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SBH vs. ULTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBH Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the ULTA Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBH and ULTA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SBH	ULTA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.12	1.18	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.14	0.33	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.16	0.28	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.38	-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between SBH and ULTA is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SBH vs. ULTA - Dividend Comparison

Neither SBH nor ULTA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SBH vs. ULTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBH drawdown since its inception was -80.53%, smaller than the maximum ULTA drawdown of -87.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBH and ULTA.

Drawdown Indicators

	SBH	ULTA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.53%	-87.89%	+7.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.76%	-27.83%	+6.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-71.29%	-44.56%	-26.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-79.14%	-64.92%	-14.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.40%	-24.08%	-35.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.92%	-20.74%	-15.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.27%	7.42%	+1.85%

Volatility

SBH vs. ULTA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. (SBH) is 10.39%, while Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) has a volatility of 17.43%. This indicates that SBH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ULTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SBH	ULTA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.39%	17.43%	-7.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.98%	26.78%	+4.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.64%	37.13%	+15.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.36%	34.24%	+15.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.53%	38.30%	+11.23%

Financials

SBH vs. ULTA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Ulta Beauty, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SBH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 483.26M and revenue of 943.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.2%.

ULTA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.48B and revenue of 3.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.1%.

SBH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 75.94M and revenue of 943.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.

ULTA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported an operating income of 464.68M and revenue of 3.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

SBH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 45.56M and revenue of 943.17M, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.

ULTA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported a net income of 356.68M and revenue of 3.90B, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.