PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBH vs. ULTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SBH vs. ULTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. (SBH) and Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBH achieves a -12.06% return, which is significantly higher than ULTA's -18.20% return. Over the past 10 years, SBH has underperformed ULTA with an annualized return of -8.46%, while ULTA has yielded a comparatively higher 7.66% annualized return.


SBH

1D
-2.34%
1M
-10.62%
YTD
-12.06%
6M
-20.73%
1Y
42.50%
3Y*
1.68%
5Y*
-10.11%
10Y*
-8.46%

ULTA

1D
-1.18%
1M
-6.97%
YTD
-18.20%
6M
-9.70%
1Y
4.04%
3Y*
5.42%
5Y*
8.25%
10Y*
7.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBH vs. ULTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBH
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.
-12.06%36.46%-21.31%6.07%-32.18%41.56%-28.55%7.04%-9.12%-28.99%
ULTA
Ulta Beauty, Inc.
-18.20%39.11%-11.24%4.46%13.76%43.59%13.44%3.39%9.47%-12.27%

Correlation

The correlation between SBH and ULTA is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2007

0.43

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SBH:

$1.26B

ULTA:

$21.76B

EPS

SBH:

$1.81

ULTA:

$26.57

PE Ratio

SBH:

6.92

ULTA:

18.62

PS Ratio

SBH:

0.34

ULTA:

1.74

PB Ratio

SBH:

1.50

ULTA:

8.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

SBH:

$3.73B

ULTA:

$12.71B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SBH:

$1.93B

ULTA:

$5.00B

EBITDA (TTM)

SBH:

$354.98M

ULTA:

$1.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBH vs. ULTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBH
SBH Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SBH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBH Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SBH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBH Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

ULTA
ULTA Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ULTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULTA Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
ULTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULTA Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBH vs. ULTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. (SBH) and Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBHULTADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.90

0.12

+0.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.54

0.41

+1.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.05

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

0.15

+1.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.79

0.39

+3.40

SBH vs. ULTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBH Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the ULTA Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBH and ULTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBHULTADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

0.12

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

0.24

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.17

0.20

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.36

-0.31

Drawdowns

SBH vs. ULTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBH drawdown since its inception was -80.53%, smaller than the maximum ULTA drawdown of -87.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBH and ULTA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBHULTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.53%

-87.89%

+7.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.47%

-32.11%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.22%

-44.56%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.21%

-44.56%

-23.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.79%

-64.92%

-12.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.05%

-29.99%

-34.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.14%

-20.79%

-15.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.61%

12.81%

-1.20%

Volatility

SBH vs. ULTA - Volatility Comparison

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. (SBH) has a higher volatility of 13.59% compared to Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) at 8.70%. This indicates that SBH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBHULTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.59%

8.70%

+4.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.60%

27.28%

+3.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.51%

32.81%

+14.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.82%

34.21%

+14.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.79%

38.28%

+11.51%

Dividends

SBH vs. ULTA - Dividend Comparison

Neither SBH nor ULTA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

SBH vs. ULTA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Ulta Beauty, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B4.00B20222023202420252026
903.38M
3.16B
(SBH) Total Revenue
(ULTA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SBH vs. ULTA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Ulta Beauty, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
52.7%
40.1%
Portfolio components
SBH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 475.77M and revenue of 903.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.7%.

ULTA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.27B and revenue of 3.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.1%.

SBH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 71.93M and revenue of 903.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.

ULTA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported an operating income of 448.26M and revenue of 3.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.2%.

SBH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 42.70M and revenue of 903.38M, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.

ULTA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported a net income of 340.47M and revenue of 3.16B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SBH and ULTA have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBH has higher volatility (13.59%) compared to ULTA (8.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBH dropped -80.53% vs ULTA's -87.89%.

SBH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBH and ULTA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer