PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SBGB vs. LQDT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SBGB and LQDT is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.0

Performance

SBGB vs. LQDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sberbank MOEX Russian Government Bond ETF (SBGB) and Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-5.98%
64.80%
SBGB
LQDT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SBGB:

-0.24

LQDT:

2.52

Sortino Ratio

SBGB:

-0.38

LQDT:

4.03

Omega Ratio

SBGB:

0.96

LQDT:

1.55

Calmar Ratio

SBGB:

-0.15

LQDT:

1.46

Martin Ratio

SBGB:

-0.30

LQDT:

24.57

Ulcer Index

SBGB:

8.06%

LQDT:

4.52%

Daily Std Dev

SBGB:

9.96%

LQDT:

44.10%

Max Drawdown

SBGB:

-22.54%

LQDT:

-95.31%

Current Drawdown

SBGB:

-4.78%

LQDT:

-43.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBGB achieves a -2.01% return, which is significantly lower than LQDT's 14.68% return.


SBGB

YTD

-2.01%

1M

-2.01%

6M

7.99%

1Y

-2.63%

5Y*

0.30%

10Y*

N/A

LQDT

YTD

14.68%

1M

14.04%

6M

64.80%

1Y

109.21%

5Y*

47.64%

10Y*

16.99%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SBGB vs. LQDT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBGB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SBGB is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SBGB is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SBGB is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SBGB is 44
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SBGB is 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SBGB is 66
Martin Ratio Rank

LQDT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LQDT is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LQDT is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LQDT is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LQDT is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LQDT is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LQDT is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SBGB vs. LQDT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sberbank MOEX Russian Government Bond ETF (SBGB) and Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SBGB, currently valued at -0.39, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00-0.392.94
The chart of Sortino ratio for SBGB, currently valued at -0.41, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.00-0.415.00
The chart of Omega ratio for SBGB, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.000.951.65
The chart of Calmar ratio for SBGB, currently valued at -0.16, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.00-0.163.10
The chart of Martin ratio for SBGB, currently valued at -0.90, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-0.9028.12
SBGB
LQDT

The current SBGB Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the LQDT Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBGB and LQDT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.39
2.94
SBGB
LQDT

Dividends

SBGB vs. LQDT - Dividend Comparison

Neither SBGB nor LQDT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SBGB vs. LQDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBGB drawdown since its inception was -22.54%, smaller than the maximum LQDT drawdown of -95.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBGB and LQDT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-48.03%
-1.54%
SBGB
LQDT

Volatility

SBGB vs. LQDT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sberbank MOEX Russian Government Bond ETF (SBGB) is 5.56%, while Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) has a volatility of 9.95%. This indicates that SBGB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.56%
9.95%
SBGB
LQDT
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab