SBFFY vs. AAPL
SBFFY (SBM Offshore NV ADR) and AAPL (Apple Inc) are both stocks. SBFFY operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while AAPL operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology). Over the past 10 years, SBFFY returned 17.84%/yr vs 30.12%/yr for AAPL. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SBFFY vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBFFY achieves a 44.10% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 14.34% return. Over the past 10 years, SBFFY has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 17.84%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 30.12% annualized return.
SBFFY
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -6.40%
- YTD
- 44.10%
- 6M
- 45.20%
- 1Y
- 113.22%
- 3Y*
- 47.07%
- 5Y*
- 25.26%
- 10Y*
- 17.84%
AAPL
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- 12.18%
- YTD
- 14.34%
- 6M
- 9.39%
- 1Y
- 53.24%
- 3Y*
- 20.25%
- 5Y*
- 20.38%
- 10Y*
- 30.12%
SBFFY vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBFFY SBM Offshore NV ADR | 44.10% | 72.76% | 42.75% | -12.32% | 13.93% | -18.27% | 12.90% | 30.83% | -21.45% | 16.02% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 14.34% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -26.40% | 34.65% | 82.31% | 88.96% | -5.39% | 48.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBFFY and AAPL is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2009 | 0.08 |
Fundamentals
SBFFY:
$7.18B
AAPL:
$4.58T
SBFFY:
$6.09
AAPL:
$8.24
SBFFY:
6.73
AAPL:
37.67
SBFFY:
0.05
AAPL:
4.96
SBFFY:
0.67
AAPL:
10.23
SBFFY:
1.63
AAPL:
43.03
SBFFY:
$10.68B
AAPL:
$451.44B
SBFFY:
$3.15B
AAPL:
$216.07B
SBFFY:
$2.92B
AAPL:
$153.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBFFY vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank
SBFFY
AAPL
SBFFY vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SBM Offshore NV ADR (SBFFY) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBFFY | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.25 | 2.40 | -0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.63 | 3.36 | +1.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.02 | 1.43 | +0.60 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.63 | 3.88 | +4.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.26 | 9.76 | +11.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBFFY | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 2.40 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.75 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 1.05 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.44 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
SBFFY vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBFFY drawdown since its inception was -65.23%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBFFY and AAPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBFFY | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.23% | -81.80% | +16.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.19% | -13.80% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.14% | -33.36% | +16.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.52% | -33.36% | +5.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.71% | -38.52% | -3.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.25% | -1.57% | -5.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.16% | -29.61% | -3.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.34% | 5.47% | -0.13% |
Volatility
SBFFY vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
SBM Offshore NV ADR (SBFFY) has a higher volatility of 10.41% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 5.46%. This indicates that SBFFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBFFY | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.41% | 5.46% | +4.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.52% | 15.91% | +6.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.62% | 22.32% | +28.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.79% | 27.46% | +9.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.40% | 28.89% | +8.51% |
Dividends
SBFFY vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
SBFFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than AAPL's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.34% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
SBFFY SBM Offshore NV ADR | 1.38% | 3.05% | 4.76% | 8.56% | 6.34% | 6.03% | 3.14% | 2.11% | 1.32% | 2.27% | 2.76% | 0.00% |
Financials
SBFFY vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SBM Offshore NV ADR and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SBFFY vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison
SBFFY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SBM Offshore NV ADR reported a gross profit of 1.17B and revenue of 3.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.2%.
AAPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.
SBFFY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SBM Offshore NV ADR reported an operating income of 1.05B and revenue of 3.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.3%.
AAPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.
SBFFY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SBM Offshore NV ADR reported a net income of 598.43M and revenue of 3.06B, resulting in a net margin of 19.6%.
AAPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SBFFY and AAPL have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SBFFY has higher volatility (10.41%) compared to AAPL (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBFFY dropped -65.23% vs AAPL's -81.80%.
AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SBFFY and AAPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer