SBAC vs. FNGU

In the year-to-date period, SBAC achieves a 9.85% return, which is significantly higher than FNGU's -26.09% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current SBAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is higher than the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBAC and FNGU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

SBAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, while FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum SBAC drawdown since its inception was -99.65%, which is greater than FNGU's maximum drawdown of -92.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBAC and FNGU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC) is 10.26%, while MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) has a volatility of 24.36%. This indicates that SBAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.