PortfoliosLab logo
SAVA vs. NVDA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SAVA and NVDA is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

SAVA vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cassava Sciences, Inc. (SAVA) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SAVA:

-0.63

NVDA:

0.38

Sortino Ratio

SAVA:

-0.60

NVDA:

0.84

Omega Ratio

SAVA:

0.90

NVDA:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

SAVA:

-0.92

NVDA:

0.51

Martin Ratio

SAVA:

-1.32

NVDA:

1.24

Ulcer Index

SAVA:

68.91%

NVDA:

15.09%

Daily Std Dev

SAVA:

144.20%

NVDA:

58.96%

Max Drawdown

SAVA:

-99.18%

NVDA:

-89.73%

Current Drawdown

SAVA:

-98.51%

NVDA:

-9.56%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SAVA:

$98.55M

NVDA:

$3.39T

EPS

SAVA:

-$1.57

NVDA:

$3.01

PS Ratio

SAVA:

0.00

NVDA:

22.86

PB Ratio

SAVA:

0.76

NVDA:

39.31

Total Revenue (TTM)

SAVA:

$0.00

NVDA:

$148.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SAVA:

-$300.00K

NVDA:

$104.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

SAVA:

-$145.66M

NVDA:

$90.97B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAVA achieves a -14.83% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, SAVA has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of -17.39%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 74.01% annualized return.


SAVA

YTD

-14.83%

1M

24.07%

6M

-47.66%

1Y

-90.88%

3Y*

-59.65%

5Y*

-1.25%

10Y*

-17.39%

NVDA

YTD

0.63%

1M

21.07%

6M

-2.24%

1Y

23.29%

3Y*

93.53%

5Y*

72.51%

10Y*

74.01%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Cassava Sciences, Inc.

NVIDIA Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SAVA vs. NVDA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAVA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SAVA is 1313
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SAVA is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SAVA is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SAVA is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SAVA is 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SAVA is 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NVDA is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NVDA is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NVDA is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SAVA vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cassava Sciences, Inc. (SAVA) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SAVA Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAVA and NVDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

SAVA vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

SAVA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SAVA
Cassava Sciences, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%1.70%

Drawdowns

SAVA vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAVA drawdown since its inception was -99.18%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -89.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAVA and NVDA.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

SAVA vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

Cassava Sciences, Inc. (SAVA) has a higher volatility of 19.95% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 10.81%. This indicates that SAVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

SAVA vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cassava Sciences, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B202120222023202420250
44.06B
(SAVA) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items