SATO vs. SPMO
SATO (Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SATO is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SATO returned 46.97%/yr vs 42.80%/yr for SPMO. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SATO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
SATO vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SATO achieves a 6.41% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 29.70% return.
SATO
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- 5.43%
- YTD
- 6.41%
- 6M
- -5.78%
- 1Y
- 16.97%
- 3Y*
- 46.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 14.80%
- YTD
- 29.70%
- 6M
- 30.19%
- 1Y
- 46.28%
- 3Y*
- 42.80%
- 5Y*
- 24.51%
- 10Y*
- 20.89%
SATO vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF | 6.41% | 2.26% | 55.25% | 266.77% | -80.20% | -17.39% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 29.70% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 4.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between SATO and SPMO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2021 | 0.53 |
The correlation between SATO and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
SATO vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SATO
SPMO
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Utilities
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
SATO
SPMO
Technology
SATO
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
SATO
SPMO
Communication Services
SATO
SPMO
Industrials
SATO
SPMO
Utilities
SATO
SPMO
Healthcare
SATO
SPMO
Basic Materials
SATO
-
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
SATO
-
SPMO
Energy
SATO
-
SPMO
Real Estate
SATO
-
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SATO vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
SATO
SPMO
SATO vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SATO | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.33 | 2.64 | -2.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.83 | 3.55 | -2.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.47 | -0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | 3.76 | -3.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.65 | 14.67 | -14.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SATO | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 2.64 | -2.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 1.01 | -1.00 |
Drawdowns
SATO vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SATO drawdown since its inception was -88.00%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SATO and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SATO | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.00% | -30.95% | -57.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.49% | -12.70% | -40.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.49% | -20.13% | -33.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.80% | 0.00% | -34.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.02% | -4.60% | -46.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.07% | 3.26% | +25.81% |
Volatility
SATO vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) has a higher volatility of 11.41% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 7.38%. This indicates that SATO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SATO | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.41% | 7.38% | +4.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.64% | 14.44% | +24.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.47% | 17.65% | +33.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.29% | 19.31% | +43.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.29% | 20.31% | +42.98% |
SATO vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SATO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
SATO vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
SATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than SPMO's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF | 7.41% | 9.50% | 15.03% | 2.21% | 8.97% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.66% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SATO and SPMO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SATO has higher volatility (11.41%) compared to SPMO (7.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SATO dropped -88.00% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 3-year performance, SATO leads with 46.97% vs 42.80% for SPMO. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SATO has performed better with a 46.97% return vs 42.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SATO.
SATO has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 0.66% for SPMO.
SATO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SPMO is Momentum. SATO tracks Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SATO and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SATO and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer