PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SATO vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SATO vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SATO achieves a -13.37% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 21.07% return.


SATO

1D
-3.22%
1M
-4.42%
6M
-16.14%
YTD
-13.37%
1Y
-18.39%
3Y*
21.83%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-3.90%

SPMO

1D
0.29%
1M
-4.64%
6M
20.51%
YTD
21.07%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
37.36%
5Y*
20.21%
10Y*
19.57%
ALL TIME*
18.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$33.71K$38.05K$74.17K
$331.54M$346.70M$350.59M

SATO vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SATO
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF
-13.37%2.26%55.25%266.77%-80.20%-17.33%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
21.07%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between SATO and SPMO is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2021

0.53

The correlation between SATO and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SATO vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SATO
SATO Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
SATO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SATO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
SATO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
SATO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
SATO Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SATO vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SATOSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.21

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.42

1.63

-2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.67

5.93

-6.61

SATO vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SATO Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is lower than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SATO and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SATO vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SATO drawdown since its inception was -88.00%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SATO and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SATOSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.00%

-30.95%

-57.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.49%

-15.64%

-37.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.49%

-20.13%

-33.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.92%

-11.03%

-35.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.68%

-4.62%

-46.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.62%

4.29%

+29.33%

Volatility

SATO vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) has a higher volatility of 16.55% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 10.53%. This indicates that SATO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SATOSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.55%

10.53%

+6.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.43%

21.52%

+17.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.26%

23.90%

+29.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.98%

20.60%

+42.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.98%

20.92%

+42.06%

SATO vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SATO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

SATO vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

SATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.74%, more than SPMO's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SATO
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF
7.74%9.50%15.03%2.21%8.97%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.73%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


SATO and SPMO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SATO has higher volatility (16.55%) compared to SPMO (10.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SATO dropped -88.00% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

On 3-year performance, SPMO leads with 37.36% vs 21.83% for SATO. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 10.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 37.36% return vs 21.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SATO.

SATO has the higher dividend yield at 7.74%, compared with 0.73% for SPMO.

SATO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SPMO is Momentum. SATO tracks Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SATO and 0.13% for SPMO.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SATO and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer