PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SATO vs. CRPT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SATO vs. CRPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF (CRPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SATO achieves a 6.41% return, which is significantly higher than CRPT's -7.86% return.


SATO

1D
-2.72%
1M
5.43%
YTD
6.41%
6M
-5.78%
1Y
16.97%
3Y*
46.97%
5Y*
10Y*

CRPT

1D
-6.43%
1M
-6.05%
YTD
-7.86%
6M
-18.17%
1Y
-27.58%
3Y*
38.83%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SATO vs. CRPT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SATO
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF
6.41%2.26%55.25%266.77%-80.20%-17.39%
CRPT
First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF
-7.86%-9.54%75.29%193.86%-80.84%-13.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SATO and CRPT is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2021

0.92

The correlation between SATO and CRPT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

SATO vs. CRPT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SATO
CRPT

Financial Services

57.1%
75.0%

Technology

32.2%
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

4.4%
19.0%

Communication Services

3.0%
5.0%

Industrials

1.9%

-

Utilities

1.5%

-

Healthcare

1.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

SATO
57.1%
CRPT
75.0%

Technology

SATO
32.2%
CRPT
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SATO
4.4%
CRPT
19.0%

Communication Services

SATO
3.0%
CRPT
5.0%

Industrials

SATO
1.9%
CRPT

-

Utilities

SATO
1.5%
CRPT

-

Healthcare

SATO
1.2%
CRPT

-

Basic Materials

SATO

-

CRPT

-

Consumer Defensive

SATO

-

CRPT

-

Energy

SATO

-

CRPT

-

Real Estate

SATO

-

CRPT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SATO vs. CRPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SATO
SATO Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
SATO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SATO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SATO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
SATO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
SATO Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

CRPT
CRPT Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
CRPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRPT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CRPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRPT Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SATO vs. CRPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF (CRPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SATOCRPTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.33

-0.48

+0.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.83

-0.39

+1.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

0.95

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

-0.46

+0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.65

-0.81

+1.46

SATO vs. CRPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SATO Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is higher than the CRPT Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SATO and CRPT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SATOCRPTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

-0.48

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

-0.08

+0.08

Drawdowns

SATO vs. CRPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SATO drawdown since its inception was -88.00%, roughly equal to the maximum CRPT drawdown of -88.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SATO and CRPT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SATOCRPTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.00%

-88.34%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.49%

-56.46%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.49%

-56.46%

+2.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.80%

-46.53%

+11.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.02%

-52.64%

+1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.07%

31.98%

-2.91%

Volatility

SATO vs. CRPT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) is 11.41%, while First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF (CRPT) has a volatility of 13.58%. This indicates that SATO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SATOCRPTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.41%

13.58%

-2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.64%

45.97%

-7.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.47%

57.54%

-6.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.29%

72.74%

-9.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.29%

72.74%

-9.45%

SATO vs. CRPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SATO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CRPT's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

SATO vs. CRPT - Dividend Comparison

SATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than CRPT's 0.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CRPT
First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF
0.82%0.75%1.84%0.00%0.03%1.16%
SATO
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF
7.41%9.50%15.03%2.21%8.97%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


SATO and CRPT have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRPT has higher volatility (13.58%) compared to SATO (11.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SATO dropped -88.00% vs CRPT's -88.34%.

On 3-year performance, SATO leads with 46.97% vs 38.83% for CRPT. On fees, SATO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SATO has been the lower-risk option at 11.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SATO has performed better with a 46.97% return vs 38.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SATO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for CRPT.

SATO has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 0.82% for CRPT.

SATO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CRPT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SATO and 0.85% for CRPT.

SATO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.33 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SATO and CRPT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer