SARK vs. GLD
SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - SARK is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. SARK is actively managed, while GLD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SARK returned -30.74%/yr vs 31.09%/yr for GLD. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. SARK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
SARK vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SARK achieves a -6.78% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 2.92% return.
SARK
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- -6.78%
- 6M
- -2.33%
- 1Y
- -33.81%
- 3Y*
- -30.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLD
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 32.04%
- 3Y*
- 31.09%
- 5Y*
- 18.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
SARK vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -6.78% | -25.93% | -36.90% | -46.32% | 83.35% | 20.78% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 2.92% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -0.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between SARK and GLD is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SARK vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
SARK
GLD
SARK vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SARK | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.24 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 1.68 | -2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.11 | 4.15 | -5.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SARK | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.95 | 1.21 | -2.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.24 | 0.60 | -0.84 |
Drawdowns
SARK vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SARK drawdown since its inception was -81.07%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SARK and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SARK | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.07% | -45.56% | -35.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.75% | -19.21% | -21.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.42% | -19.21% | -55.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.42% | -17.75% | -61.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.46% | -16.16% | -30.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.47% | 7.73% | +22.74% |
Volatility
SARK vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) has a higher volatility of 9.13% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 5.51%. This indicates that SARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SARK | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.13% | 5.51% | +3.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.05% | 23.16% | +1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.91% | 26.61% | +9.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.24% | 18.00% | +38.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.24% | 15.95% | +40.29% |
SARK vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SARK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SARK vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
SARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 3.02% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SARK and GLD have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SARK has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to GLD (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SARK dropped -81.07% vs GLD's -45.56%.
On 3-year performance, GLD leads with 31.09% vs -30.74% for SARK. On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GLD has performed better with a 31.09% return vs -30.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SARK.
SARK has the higher dividend yield at 3.02%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
SARK is categorized as Inverse Equities, while GLD is Gold. They also come from different issuers: AXS and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SARK and 0.40% for GLD.
GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SARK and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer