PortfoliosLab logo
SAR vs. CGBD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SAR and CGBD is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

SAR vs. CGBD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Investment Corp. (SAR) and TCG BDC, Inc. (CGBD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SAR:

0.98

CGBD:

-0.70

Sortino Ratio

SAR:

1.32

CGBD:

-0.81

Omega Ratio

SAR:

1.21

CGBD:

0.89

Calmar Ratio

SAR:

1.45

CGBD:

-0.66

Martin Ratio

SAR:

5.50

CGBD:

-1.66

Ulcer Index

SAR:

3.78%

CGBD:

9.89%

Daily Std Dev

SAR:

21.97%

CGBD:

23.71%

Max Drawdown

SAR:

-90.83%

CGBD:

-71.62%

Current Drawdown

SAR:

-1.04%

CGBD:

-22.26%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SAR:

$380.74M

CGBD:

$1.02B

EPS

SAR:

$2.02

CGBD:

$1.31

PE Ratio

SAR:

12.27

CGBD:

10.73

PEG Ratio

SAR:

0.00

CGBD:

3.54

PS Ratio

SAR:

2.56

CGBD:

4.54

PB Ratio

SAR:

0.97

CGBD:

0.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

SAR:

$71.32M

CGBD:

$202.57M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SAR:

$32.22M

CGBD:

$117.52M

EBITDA (TTM)

SAR:

$24.95M

CGBD:

$96.97M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAR achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly higher than CGBD's -19.53% return.


SAR

YTD

9.05%

1M

0.48%

6M

4.59%

1Y

20.45%

3Y*

9.68%

5Y*

21.83%

10Y*

14.01%

CGBD

YTD

-19.53%

1M

-4.42%

6M

-16.51%

1Y

-17.05%

3Y*

6.62%

5Y*

19.00%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Saratoga Investment Corp.

TCG BDC, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SAR vs. CGBD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SAR is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SAR is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SAR is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SAR is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SAR is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SAR is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

CGBD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CGBD is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CGBD is 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CGBD is 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CGBD is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CGBD is 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CGBD is 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SAR vs. CGBD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Investment Corp. (SAR) and TCG BDC, Inc. (CGBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SAR Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the CGBD Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAR and CGBD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

SAR vs. CGBD - Dividend Comparison

SAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.96%, more than CGBD's 6.90% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SAR
Saratoga Investment Corp.
13.96%12.33%10.90%11.02%6.16%6.57%6.61%10.35%10.51%9.12%14.14%1.21%
CGBD
TCG BDC, Inc.
6.90%5.13%5.88%7.97%7.36%14.33%11.06%13.55%6.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SAR vs. CGBD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAR drawdown since its inception was -90.83%, which is greater than CGBD's maximum drawdown of -71.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAR and CGBD.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

SAR vs. CGBD - Volatility Comparison

Saratoga Investment Corp. (SAR) has a higher volatility of 10.00% compared to TCG BDC, Inc. (CGBD) at 8.70%. This indicates that SAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

SAR vs. CGBD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Saratoga Investment Corp. and TCG BDC, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M50.00M60.00MJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
17.47M
54.86M
(SAR) Total Revenue
(CGBD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items