PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAND vs. AAAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SAND vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sandstorm Gold Ltd. (SAND) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SAND vs. AAAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SAND
Sandstorm Gold Ltd.
0.00%118.72%12.15%-3.32%-14.29%-13.53%-3.76%61.61%24.93%
AAAU
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
10.48%64.06%26.91%12.96%-0.50%-4.01%25.02%18.17%9.20%

Returns By Period


SAND

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AAAU

1D
1.78%
1M
-10.64%
YTD
10.48%
6M
23.10%
1Y
52.53%
3Y*
33.97%
5Y*
22.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAND vs. AAAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAND

AAAU
AAAU Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AAAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAU Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAU Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAND vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sandstorm Gold Ltd. (SAND) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SAND vs. AAAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SANDAAAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

Correlation

The correlation between SAND and AAAU is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SAND vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison

SAND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022
SAND
Sandstorm Gold Ltd.
0.36%0.47%1.06%1.19%1.17%
AAAU
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SAND vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SANDAAAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.21%

Volatility

SAND vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SANDAAAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.92%