SAMG vs. SI=F

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (SAMG) and Silver (SI=F).

Performance

SAMG vs. SI=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (SAMG) and Silver (SI=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SAMG vs. SI=F - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SAMG Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.	-10.62%	-13.00%	13.34%	-5.65%	13.58%	28.82%	16.48%	-0.55%	-14.49%	26.39%
SI=F Silver	6.11%	141.44%	21.41%	0.19%	2.95%	-11.59%	47.38%	15.32%	-9.36%	7.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAMG achieves a -10.62% return, which is significantly lower than SI=F's 6.11% return. Over the past 10 years, SAMG has underperformed SI=F with an annualized return of 4.61%, while SI=F has yielded a comparatively higher 17.41% annualized return.

SAMG

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: -12.52%
• YTD: -10.62%
• 6M: -9.33%
• 1Y: -14.57%
• 3Y*: -5.28%
• 5Y*: 2.94%
• 10Y*: 4.61%

SI=F

• 1D: 6.16%
• 1M: -15.68%
• YTD: 6.11%
• 6M: 58.42%
• 1Y: 118.37%
• 3Y*: 45.65%
• 5Y*: 24.59%
• 10Y*: 17.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SAMG vs. SI=F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAMG

SAMG Risk / Return Rank: 17
SAMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
SAMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
SAMG Omega Ratio Rank: 18
SAMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
SAMG Martin Ratio Rank: 13

SI=F

SI=F Risk / Return Rank: 78
SI=F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
SI=F Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
SI=F Omega Ratio Rank: 88
SI=F Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
SI=F Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAMG vs. SI=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (SAMG) and Silver (SI=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SAMG	SI=F	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	1.56	-2.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.54	1.93	-2.47
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.34	-0.41
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.66	3.09	-3.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.35	8.80	-10.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SAMG vs. SI=F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAMG Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the SI=F Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAMG and SI=F, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SAMG	SI=F	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.51	1.56	-2.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	0.62	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11	0.50	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.22	-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between SAMG and SI=F is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Drawdowns

SAMG vs. SI=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAMG drawdown since its inception was -54.78%, smaller than the maximum SI=F drawdown of -91.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAMG and SI=F.

Drawdown Indicators

	SAMG	SI=F	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.78%	-91.54%	+36.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.76%	-41.00%	+20.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.72%	-41.00%	+6.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.78%	-43.13%	-11.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.60%	-34.94%	+3.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.11%	-61.14%	+43.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.13%	14.41%	-4.28%

Volatility

SAMG vs. SI=F - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (SAMG) is 9.14%, while Silver (SI=F) has a volatility of 18.12%. This indicates that SAMG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SI=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SAMG	SI=F	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.14%	18.12%	-8.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.34%	62.49%	-43.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.52%	58.92%	-30.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.38%	37.21%	-3.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.72%	33.13%	+7.59%