SAMBX vs. BSV

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SAMBX (Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund) and BSV (Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares) are both funds - SAMBX is a Bank Loan fund managed by Virtus, while BSV is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. 1–5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. Over the past 10 years, SAMBX returned 4.54%/yr vs 1.90%/yr for BSV. Their 0.00 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SAMBX charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BSV.

Performance

SAMBX vs. BSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAMBX achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly higher than BSV's 0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, SAMBX has outperformed BSV with an annualized return of 4.54%, while BSV has yielded a comparatively lower 1.90% annualized return.

SAMBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 2.94%
• YTD: 2.76%
• 1Y: 5.74%
• 3Y*: 6.57%
• 5Y*: 5.48%
• 10Y*: 4.54%
• ALL TIME*: 4.30%

BSV

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -0.22%
• 6M: 0.27%
• YTD: 0.42%
• 1Y: 2.36%
• 3Y*: 4.55%
• 5Y*: 1.61%
• 10Y*: 1.90%
• ALL TIME*: 2.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares	$124.18M	$168.72M	$200.19M
SAMBX Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

SAMBX vs. BSV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SAMBX Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund	2.76%	5.88%	7.03%	11.21%	-0.86%	4.86%	0.41%	6.66%	0.24%	3.89%
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares	0.42%	6.00%	3.78%	4.90%	-5.49%	-1.09%	4.70%	4.98%	1.34%	1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SAMBX and BSV is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.10
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2007	0.00

Return for Risk

SAMBX vs. BSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SAMBX

SAMBX Risk / Return Rank: 98
SAMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
SAMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
SAMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
SAMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
SAMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

BSV

BSV Risk / Return Rank: 71
BSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
BSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
BSV Omega Ratio Rank: 75
BSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BSV Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SAMBX vs. BSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SAMBX	BSV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	1.66	+0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.37	2.57	+3.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.93	1.31	+0.62
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.08	2.33	+5.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.51	7.21	+17.30

SAMBX vs. BSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAMBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the BSV Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAMBX and BSV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SAMBX vs. BSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAMBX drawdown since its inception was -24.74%, which is greater than BSV's maximum drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAMBX and BSV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SAMBX	BSV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.74%	-8.54%	-16.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.78%	-1.29%	+0.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.95%	-1.53%	-1.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-5.66%	-8.54%	+2.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.91%	-8.54%	-12.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	-0.50%	+0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.57%	-0.97%	-0.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.26%	0.42%	-0.16%

Volatility

SAMBX vs. BSV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX) is 0.27%, while Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) has a volatility of 0.49%. This indicates that SAMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SAMBX	BSV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.27%	0.49%	-0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.69%	1.41%	+0.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.45%	1.81%	+0.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.96%	2.74%	+0.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.93%	2.38%	+1.55%

SAMBX vs. BSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAMBX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than BSV's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

SAMBX vs. BSV - Dividend Comparison

SAMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.76%, more than BSV's 4.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares	3.68%	3.83%	3.38%	2.46%	1.50%	1.45%	1.79%	2.29%	1.99%	1.65%	1.48%	1.40%
SAMBX Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund	6.76%	7.78%	8.21%	8.21%	5.34%	3.03%	4.03%	5.28%	5.15%	4.28%	4.79%	4.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SAMBX and BSV in my portfolio?

SAMBX and BSV have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SAMBX or BSV?

BSV has higher volatility (0.49%) compared to SAMBX (0.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAMBX dropped -24.74% vs BSV's -8.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SAMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.