PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAMBX vs. BSV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAMBX vs. BSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAMBX achieves a 2.55% return, which is significantly higher than BSV's 0.21% return. Over the past 10 years, SAMBX has outperformed BSV with an annualized return of 4.71%, while BSV has yielded a comparatively lower 1.90% annualized return.


SAMBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.46%
YTD
2.55%
6M
3.69%
1Y
7.30%
3Y*
7.29%
5Y*
5.52%
10Y*
4.71%

BSV

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.11%
YTD
0.21%
6M
0.37%
1Y
3.25%
3Y*
4.47%
5Y*
1.66%
10Y*
1.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAMBX vs. BSV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAMBX
Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund
2.55%5.88%7.03%11.21%-0.86%4.86%0.41%6.66%0.24%3.89%
BSV
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares
0.21%6.00%3.78%4.90%-5.49%-1.09%4.70%4.98%1.34%1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SAMBX and BSV is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2007

0.01

The correlation between SAMBX and BSV shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (all time) to 0.11 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAMBX vs. BSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAMBX
SAMBX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SAMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
SAMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

BSV
BSV Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
BSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSV Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAMBX vs. BSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SAMBXBSVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.15

1.34

+0.81

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.38

2.53

+6.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

29.39

8.35

+21.04

SAMBX vs. BSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAMBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is higher than the BSV Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAMBX and BSV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SAMBX vs. BSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAMBX drawdown since its inception was -24.74%, which is greater than BSV's maximum drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAMBX and BSV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAMBXBSVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.74%

-8.54%

-16.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.78%

-1.29%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.95%

-1.53%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.66%

-8.54%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.91%

-8.54%

-12.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.70%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.58%

-0.97%

-0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

0.39%

-0.14%

Volatility

SAMBX vs. BSV - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX) has a higher volatility of 0.69% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) at 0.59%. This indicates that SAMBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAMBXBSVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

0.59%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.79%

1.33%

+0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45%

1.82%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.96%

2.73%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.94%

2.38%

+1.56%

SAMBX vs. BSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAMBX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than BSV's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAMBX vs. BSV - Dividend Comparison

SAMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%, more than BSV's 4.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSV
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares
4.00%3.83%3.38%2.46%1.50%1.45%1.79%2.29%1.99%1.65%1.48%1.40%
SAMBX
Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund
7.43%7.78%8.21%8.21%5.34%3.03%4.03%5.28%5.15%4.28%4.79%4.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


SAMBX and BSV have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAMBX has higher volatility (0.69%) compared to BSV (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAMBX dropped -24.74% vs BSV's -8.54%.

SAMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAMBX and BSV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer