PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAM vs. BUD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SAM vs. BUD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM) and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAM achieves a -16.08% return, which is significantly lower than BUD's 25.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SAM has outperformed BUD with an annualized return of 0.61%, while BUD has yielded a comparatively lower -2.62% annualized return.


SAM

1D
0.81%
1M
-20.95%
YTD
-16.08%
6M
-18.47%
1Y
-27.01%
3Y*
-21.82%
5Y*
-31.76%
10Y*
0.61%

BUD

1D
-1.91%
1M
8.53%
YTD
25.25%
6M
30.24%
1Y
13.84%
3Y*
14.78%
5Y*
2.01%
10Y*
-2.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAM vs. BUD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAM
The Boston Beer Company, Inc.
-16.08%-34.95%-13.20%4.88%-34.76%-49.20%163.14%56.89%26.03%12.51%
BUD
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
25.25%30.33%-21.37%9.04%0.09%-12.66%-13.97%27.69%-38.79%9.62%

Correlation

The correlation between SAM and BUD is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2009

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SAM:

$1.71B

BUD:

$156.32B

EPS

SAM:

-$5.70

BUD:

$6.15

PS Ratio

SAM:

0.84

BUD:

1.30

PB Ratio

SAM:

2.51

BUD:

1.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

SAM:

$2.09B

BUD:

$120.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SAM:

$947.28M

BUD:

$67.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

SAM:

$23.70M

BUD:

$35.48B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAM vs. BUD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAM
SAM Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAM Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAM Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

BUD
BUD Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
BUD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUD Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
BUD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUD Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAM vs. BUD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM) and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAMBUDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.13

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

0.68

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.15

1.28

-3.43

SAM vs. BUD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAM Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the BUD Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAM and BUD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAMBUDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.74

0.53

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.80

0.08

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

-0.09

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.26

-0.11

Drawdowns

SAM vs. BUD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAM drawdown since its inception was -87.57%, which is greater than BUD's maximum drawdown of -70.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAM and BUD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAMBUDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.57%

-70.02%

-17.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.54%

-20.36%

-17.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.74%

-31.55%

-27.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.32%

-42.88%

-42.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.57%

-70.02%

-17.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.47%

-26.41%

-61.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.69%

-23.45%

-17.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.56%

10.84%

+1.72%

Volatility

SAM vs. BUD - Volatility Comparison

The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM) has a higher volatility of 11.42% compared to Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) at 10.32%. This indicates that SAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAMBUDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.42%

10.32%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.81%

17.96%

+9.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.69%

26.23%

+10.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.76%

24.88%

+14.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.76%

27.66%

+13.10%

Dividends

SAM vs. BUD - Dividend Comparison

SAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BUD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUD
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
1.70%1.91%1.74%1.28%0.88%0.98%0.79%2.45%5.15%3.63%5.41%3.21%
SAM
The Boston Beer Company, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SAM vs. BUD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Boston Beer Company, Inc. and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
461.58M
30.61B
(SAM) Total Revenue
(BUD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SAM vs. BUD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Boston Beer Company, Inc. and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%20222023202420252026
46.4%
55.9%
Portfolio components
SAM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Boston Beer Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 213.96M and revenue of 461.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.4%.

BUD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV reported a gross profit of 17.10B and revenue of 30.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.9%.

SAM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Boston Beer Company, Inc. reported an operating income of -190.46M and revenue of 461.58M, resulting in an operating margin of -41.3%.

BUD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV reported an operating income of 80.56M and revenue of 30.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.

SAM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Boston Beer Company, Inc. reported a net income of -145.26M and revenue of 461.58M, resulting in a net margin of -31.5%.

BUD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV reported a net income of 3.01B and revenue of 30.61B, resulting in a net margin of 9.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SAM and BUD have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAM has higher volatility (11.42%) compared to BUD (10.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAM dropped -87.57% vs BUD's -70.02%.

BUD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAM and BUD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer