PortfoliosLab logo
SAFE vs. RNG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SAFE and RNG is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

SAFE vs. RNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Safehold Inc. (SAFE) and RingCentral, Inc. (RNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

SAFE:

50.84%

RNG:

25.85%

Max Drawdown

SAFE:

-3.82%

RNG:

0.00%

Current Drawdown

SAFE:

-3.82%

RNG:

0.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SAFE:

$1.10B

RNG:

$2.51B

EPS

SAFE:

$1.46

RNG:

-$0.43

PEG Ratio

SAFE:

0.65

RNG:

0.26

PS Ratio

SAFE:

2.81

RNG:

1.04

PB Ratio

SAFE:

0.47

RNG:

102.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

SAFE:

$273.01M

RNG:

$2.43B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SAFE:

$267.48M

RNG:

$1.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

SAFE:

$230.86M

RNG:

$214.90M

Returns By Period


SAFE

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

RNG

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SAFE vs. RNG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAFE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SAFE is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SAFE is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SAFE is 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SAFE is 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SAFE is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SAFE is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

RNG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RNG is 3939
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RNG is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RNG is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RNG is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RNG is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RNG is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SAFE vs. RNG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Safehold Inc. (SAFE) and RingCentral, Inc. (RNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

SAFE vs. RNG - Dividend Comparison

SAFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, while RNG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
SAFE
Safehold Inc.
4.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RNG
RingCentral, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SAFE vs. RNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAFE drawdown since its inception was -3.82%, which is greater than RNG's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAFE and RNG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

SAFE vs. RNG - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

SAFE vs. RNG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Safehold Inc. and RingCentral, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M20212022202320242025
91.87M
614.51M
(SAFE) Total Revenue
(RNG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SAFE vs. RNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Safehold Inc. and RingCentral, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
98.9%
70.9%
(SAFE) Gross Margin
(RNG) Gross Margin
SAFE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Safehold Inc. reported a gross profit of 90.82M and revenue of 91.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.9%.

RNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, RingCentral, Inc. reported a gross profit of 435.73M and revenue of 614.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.9%.

SAFE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Safehold Inc. reported an operating income of 22.63M and revenue of 91.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.6%.

RNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, RingCentral, Inc. reported an operating income of 15.64M and revenue of 614.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%.

SAFE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Safehold Inc. reported a net income of 26.04M and revenue of 91.87M, resulting in a net margin of 28.3%.

RNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, RingCentral, Inc. reported a net income of -7.19M and revenue of 614.51M, resulting in a net margin of -1.2%.