SAFE vs. RNG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Safehold Inc. (SAFE) and RingCentral, Inc. (RNG).

Performance

SAFE vs. RNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Safehold Inc. (SAFE) and RingCentral, Inc. (RNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SAFE vs. RNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SAFE Safehold Inc.	0.13%	-22.47%	-18.25%	-15.60%	-63.41%	11.15%	82.46%	118.07%	10.49%	-5.74%
RNG RingCentral, Inc.	29.00%	-17.51%	3.12%	-4.10%	-81.10%	-50.56%	124.68%	104.60%	70.33%	28.89%

Fundamentals

Market Cap SAFE : $972.35M RNG : $3.27B
EPS SAFE : $1.59 RNG : $0.48
PE Ratio SAFE : 8.49 RNG : 77.93
PS Ratio SAFE : 2.52 RNG : 1.34
Total Revenue (TTM) SAFE : $385.55M RNG : $2.52B
Gross Profit (TTM) SAFE : $376.57M RNG : $1.79B
EBITDA (TTM) SAFE : $334.05M RNG : $331.71M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAFE achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than RNG's 29.00% return.

SAFE

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -15.07%
• YTD: 0.13%
• 6M: -10.35%
• 1Y: -24.11%
• 3Y*: -19.65%
• 5Y*: -26.00%
• 10Y*: —

RNG

• 1D: 2.68%
• 1M: 2.21%
• YTD: 29.00%
• 6M: 31.46%
• 1Y: 50.47%
• 3Y*: 6.70%
• 5Y*: -34.33%
• 10Y*: 8.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SAFE vs. RNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAFE

SAFE Risk / Return Rank: 17
SAFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
SAFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
SAFE Omega Ratio Rank: 16
SAFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
SAFE Martin Ratio Rank: 22

RNG

RNG Risk / Return Rank: 73
RNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
RNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
RNG Omega Ratio Rank: 71
RNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
RNG Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAFE vs. RNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Safehold Inc. (SAFE) and RingCentral, Inc. (RNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SAFE	RNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.66	0.79	-1.45
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.76	1.76	-2.52
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.22	-0.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.69	1.95	-2.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.09	4.34	-5.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SAFE vs. RNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAFE Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the RNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAFE and RNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SAFE	RNG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.66	0.79	-1.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.65	-0.55	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.03	0.11	-0.14

Correlation

The correlation between SAFE and RNG is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SAFE vs. RNG - Dividend Comparison

SAFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, more than RNG's 0.20% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SAFE Safehold Inc.	5.23%	5.17%	3.83%	3.03%	2.45%	0.84%	1.10%	1.15%	3.19%	1.78%
RNG RingCentral, Inc.	0.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

SAFE vs. RNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAFE drawdown since its inception was -84.70%, smaller than the maximum RNG drawdown of -95.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAFE and RNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SAFE	RNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.70%	-95.15%	+10.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.83%	-23.49%	-5.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-84.70%	-93.49%	+8.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-95.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-83.35%	-91.60%	+8.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.11%	-41.60%	+2.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.09%	10.52%	+8.57%

Volatility

SAFE vs. RNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Safehold Inc. (SAFE) is 8.17%, while RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) has a volatility of 15.68%. This indicates that SAFE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SAFE	RNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.17%	15.68%	-7.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.42%	46.78%	-22.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.88%	64.68%	-27.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.19%	62.12%	-21.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.17%	54.96%	-13.79%

Financials

SAFE vs. RNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Safehold Inc. and RingCentral, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SAFE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Safehold Inc. reported a gross profit of 92.33M and revenue of 97.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 94.3%.

RNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, RingCentral, Inc. reported a gross profit of 460.53M and revenue of 644.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.5%.

SAFE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Safehold Inc. reported an operating income of 79.30M and revenue of 97.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 81.0%.

RNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, RingCentral, Inc. reported an operating income of 42.44M and revenue of 644.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.6%.

SAFE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Safehold Inc. reported a net income of 27.88M and revenue of 97.87M, resulting in a net margin of 28.5%.

RNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, RingCentral, Inc. reported a net income of 22.97M and revenue of 644.03M, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.