SAA vs. IJR
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR).
SAA and IJR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SAA is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%). It was launched on Jan 25, 2007. IJR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both SAA and IJR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SAA or IJR.
Correlation
The correlation between SAA and IJR is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SAA vs. IJR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SAA:
0.28
IJR:
0.58
SAA:
0.70
IJR:
0.96
SAA:
1.08
IJR:
1.11
SAA:
0.30
IJR:
0.96
SAA:
1.29
IJR:
3.14
SAA:
8.92%
IJR:
3.66%
SAA:
40.76%
IJR:
19.88%
SAA:
-87.40%
IJR:
-58.15%
SAA:
-25.01%
IJR:
-8.47%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAA achieves a 6.46% return, which is significantly lower than IJR's 8.90% return. Over the past 10 years, SAA has outperformed IJR with an annualized return of 10.29%, while IJR has yielded a comparatively lower 9.12% annualized return.
SAA
6.46%
-7.36%
15.92%
7.26%
4.25%
10.29%
IJR
8.90%
-3.32%
10.79%
9.27%
8.38%
9.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SAA vs. IJR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAA has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IJR's 0.07% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SAA vs. IJR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SAA vs. IJR - Dividend Comparison
SAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than IJR's 2.29% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 | 0.82% | 0.87% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.35% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 2.05% | 1.31% | 1.41% | 1.53% | 1.11% | 1.44% | 1.58% | 1.20% | 1.21% | 1.48% | 1.23% | 1.00% |
Drawdowns
SAA vs. IJR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAA drawdown since its inception was -87.40%, which is greater than IJR's maximum drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAA and IJR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SAA vs. IJR - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) has a higher volatility of 12.42% compared to iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) at 5.90%. This indicates that SAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.